Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law is a student-run law review covering legal scholarship in the field of intellectual property, established in 2001 [1] at the John Marshall Law School (Chicago). The journal publishes four issues per year, which are available on LexisNexis and Westlaw.
IDEA: The Law Review of the Franklin Pierce Center for Intellectual Property. 38 (3): 403– 437. This article was cited by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in State Street Bank v. Signature Financial Group, 149 F. 3d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 1998). Bertha, Steve L. (1996). "Intellectual Property Activities in U. S. Research Universities" (PDF).
Moore v. Texas, 137 S. Ct. 1039 (2017), is a United States Supreme Court decision about the death penalty and intellectual disability.The court held that contemporary clinical standards determine what an intellectual disability is, and held that even milder forms of intellectual disability may bar a person from being sentenced to death due to the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel ...
The New York University Journal of Intellectual Property and Entertainment Law (or JIPEL) is a student-edited law review at New York University School of Law.The journal publishes articles, essays, notes, and commentary that cover a wide range of topics in intellectual property law and entertainment law.
According to the 2019 Washington & Lee journal and law review rankings, it is ranked number one in the US for intellectual property law, number two in communications and media law, number three for arts, entertainment, and sports law, and was the most cited US law journal devoted to intellectual property law. [1]
This list includes notable journals and magazines concerned with intellectual property (IP) law and business, and their various sub-fields, such as copyright, patent and trademark laws. The list also includes official journals and gazettes of patent offices .
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=IDEA:_The_Law_Review_of_the_Franklin_Pierce_Center_for_Intellectual_Property&oldid=933622765"
The review coincided with a 2006 survey carried out on behalf of the National Consumer Council, which indicated that over half of British adults infringe copyright law by duplicating and ripping music CDs. [1] Following the review, in January 2008 the government initiated a public consultation period on proposals to legalise personal copying. [2]