enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. 2011 Wisconsin Act 10 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Wisconsin_Act_10

    2011 Wisconsin Act 10, also known as the Wisconsin Budget Repair Bill or the Wisconsin Budget Adjustment Act, [1] [2] is a controversial law enacted by the 100th Wisconsin Legislature which significantly limited the rights and compensation of state and local government employees in Wisconsin.

  3. Judge overturns Act 10 collective bargaining restrictions ...

    www.aol.com/news/judge-overturns-act-10...

    “Despite Act 10 being upheld repeatedly by state and federal courts, an activist Dane County judge decided to issue a ruling suddenly deciding Wisconsin's law is unconstitutional. We will appeal ...

  4. Act 10 overturned by Dane County judge. Walker-era law ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/act-10-overturned-dane-county...

    The law, which came to be known as Act. 10, took effect in June 2011. It ended the ability of public-sector unions to negotiate over any issues other than raises, and those raises were capped at ...

  5. Wisconsin's Act 10 has been overturned. Here's what to know ...

    www.aol.com/wisconsins-act-10-overturned-heres...

    “This lawsuit came more than a decade after Act 10 became law and after many courts rejected the same meritless legal challenges," Vos said. "Act 10 has saved Wisconsin taxpayers more than $16 ...

  6. United States v. Butler - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Butler

    United States v. Butler, 297 U.S. 1 (1936), is a U.S. Supreme Court case that held that the U.S. Congress has not only the power to lay taxes to the level necessary to carry out its other powers enumerated in Article I of the U.S. Constitution, but also a broad authority to tax and spend for the "general welfare" of the United States. [1]

  7. Marbury v. Madison - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marbury_v._Madison

    Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 is unconstitutional to the extent it purports to enlarge the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court beyond that permitted by the Constitution. Congress cannot pass laws that are contrary to the Constitution, and it is the role of the judiciary to interpret what the Constitution permits. Court membership

  8. A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A.L.A._Schechter_Poultry...

    Section 3 of the National Industrial Recovery Act was an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power to the Executive, and was not a valid exercise of congressional Commerce Clause power. United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part. Court membership; Chief Justice Charles E. Hughes Associate ...

  9. Article Three of the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Three_of_the...

    However, Justice Marshall contended that the Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional, since it purported to grant original jurisdiction to the Supreme Court in cases not involving the States or ambassadors [citation needed]. The ruling thereby established that the federal courts could exercise judicial review over the actions of Congress or ...