Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Commissioner v. Duberstein, 363 U.S. 278 (1960), was a United States Supreme Court case from 1960 dealing with the exclusion of "the value of property acquired by gift" from the gross income of an income taxpayer.
An award does not qualify as a tax-free employee achievement award if the award is cash, cash equivalents, gift cards, gift certificates, vacations, meals, lodging, tickets to events, stocks, bonds, other securities, and similar items. [17] Section 79 excludes $50,000 worth of group term life insurance coverage provided by an employer to an ...
Under US Internal Revenue Service Code § 132(a)(4), “de minimis fringe” benefits provided by the employer can be excluded from the employee’s gross income. [1] “ De minimis fringe” means any property or service whose value (after taking account of the frequency with which the employer provides smaller fringes to his employees) is so small as to make accounting for it unreasonable or ...
In ruling for the former mayor, the justices drew a distinction between bribery, which requires proof of an illegal deal, and a gratuity that can be a gift or a reward for a past favor.
In economics, a gift tax is the tax on money or property that one living person or corporate entity gives to another. [1] A gift tax is a type of transfer tax that is imposed when someone gives something of value to someone else. The transfer must be gratuitous or the receiving party must pay a lesser amount than the item's full value to be ...
Discover the latest breaking news in the U.S. and around the world — politics, weather, entertainment, lifestyle, finance, sports and much more.
In the case where a gift is substituted for honorarium (gift in lieu of money), it is still classified as a taxable benefit by Canada Revenue Agency. [ 11 ] In cases where an honorarium is paid to an individual who is not a resident of Canada, the honorarium is still subjected to income tax withholding (usually 15%) unless prior approval was ...
First, the gift basis provision in §1015 provides that the gift recipient is to take the donor's basis. A second, similar, mechanism exists in §1041, requiring the recipient of marital property in a divorce settlement to take the basis of the transferring spouse. The good news is that the recipient in both cases has received a "free" gift.