Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Typically, however, the one-way ANOVA is used to test for differences among at least three groups, since the two-group case can be covered by a t-test (Gosset, 1908). When there are only two means to compare, the t-test and the F-test are equivalent; the relation between ANOVA and t is given by F = t 2.
The Kruskal–Wallis test by ranks, Kruskal–Wallis test (named after William Kruskal and W. Allen Wallis), or one-way ANOVA on ranks is a non-parametric statistical test for testing whether samples originate from the same distribution. [1] [2] [3] It is used for comparing two or more independent samples of equal or different sample sizes.
Balanced experiments (those with an equal sample size for each treatment) are relatively easy to interpret; unbalanced experiments offer more complexity. For single-factor (one-way) ANOVA, the adjustment for unbalanced data is easy, but the unbalanced analysis lacks both robustness and power. [57]
The formula for the one-way ANOVA F-test statistic is =, or =. The "explained variance", or "between-group variability" is = (¯ ¯) / where ¯ denotes the sample mean in the i-th group, is the number of observations in the i-th group, ¯ denotes the overall mean of the data, and denotes the number of groups.
Another omnibus test we can find in ANOVA is the F test for testing one of the ANOVA assumptions: the equality of variance between groups. In One-Way ANOVA, for example, the hypotheses tested by omnibus F test are: H0: μ 1 =μ 2 =....= μ k. H1: at least one pair μ j ≠μ j'
Suppose that we take a sample of size n from each of k populations with the same normal distribution N(μ, σ 2) and suppose that ¯ is the smallest of these sample means and ¯ is the largest of these sample means, and suppose S 2 is the pooled sample variance from these samples. Then the following random variable has a Studentized range ...
For B = 10% one requires n = 100, for B = 5% one needs n = 400, for B = 3% the requirement approximates to n = 1000, while for B = 1% a sample size of n = 10000 is required. These numbers are quoted often in news reports of opinion polls and other sample surveys .
O’Brien and Kaiser [11] suggested that when you have a large violation of sphericity (i.e., epsilon < .70) and your sample size is greater than k + 10 (i.e., the number of levels of the repeated measures factor + 10), then a MANOVA is more powerful; in other cases, repeated measures design should be selected. [5]