Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Correspondence theory is a traditional model which goes back at least to some of the ancient Greek philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle. [2] [3] This class of theories holds that the truth or the falsity of a representation is determined solely by how it relates to a reality; that is, by whether it accurately describes that reality.
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Help; Learn to edit; Community portal; Recent changes; Upload file
Immanuel Kant endorses a definition of truth along the lines of the correspondence theory of truth. [71] Kant writes in the Critique of Pure Reason: "The nominal definition of truth, namely that it is the agreement of cognition with its object, is here granted and presupposed". [83]
1 Correspondence theory bias? 2 List of Major Philosophers on Truth. 3 Correspondence not necessarily true. 4 Truth and Nature of Reality Section. 5 The semantic theory.
However, Spinoza and Kant have also been interpreted as defenders of the correspondence theory of truth. [11] In late modern philosophy, epistemic coherentist views were held by Schlegel [12] and Hegel, [13] but the definitive formulation of the coherence theory of justification was provided by F. H. Bradley in his book The Principles of Logic ...
Correspondence is quite simply when a claim corresponds with its object. For example, the claim that the White House is in Washington, D.C. is true, if the White House is actually located in Washington. Correspondence is held by many philosophers to be the most valid of the criteria of truth.
The semantic conception of truth, which is related in different ways to both the correspondence and deflationary conceptions, is due to work by Polish logician Alfred Tarski. Tarski, in "On the Concept of Truth in Formal Languages" (1935), attempted to formulate a new theory of truth in order to resolve the liar paradox.
This "modification" of the consensus view is an appeal to the correspondence theory of truth, which is opposed to the consensus theory of truth. Long-run scientific pragmatism was defended by Charles Sanders Peirce. A variant of this viewpoint is associated with Jürgen Habermas, though he later abandoned it.