Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Article 13(4) added. Enable Parliament to dilute Fundamental Rights through amendments to the Constitution. It was made compulsory for the President to give consent to the Constitution Amendment Bill. 25th: Amend article 31. Insert article 31C. [31] 8 December 1971 Restrict property rights and compensation in case the state takes over private ...
Short title This Act may be called the Constitution (Twenty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1971. 2. Amendment of article 13 In article 13 of the Constitution, after clause (3), the following clause shall be inserted, namely:— "(4) Nothing in this article shall apply to any amendment of this Constitution made under article 368." 3.
The Ninety-fifth Amendment of the Constitution of India, officially known as The Constitution (Ninety-fifth Amendment) Act, 2009, extended the period of reservation of seats for the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes and representation of the Anglo-Indians in the Lok Sabha and the State Legislative Assemblies for another ten years, i.e. up to 26 January 2020.
The Ninety-ninth Amendment of the Constitution of India, officially known as The Constitution (Ninety-ninth Amendment) Act, 2014, formed a National Judicial Appointments Commission. 16 State assemblies out of 29 States including Goa, Rajasthan, Tripura, Gujarat and Telangana ratified the Central Legislation, enabling the President of India to give assent to the bill.
The Committee suggested certain amendments in the Enacting Formula and clauses 1 and 3 of the Bill. The Bill, as reported by the Joint Committee, was withdrawn on 2 April 1969, by leave of the House. [3] The Constitution (Twenty-second Amendment) Bill, 1969 (Bill No. 34 of 1969) was introduced in the Lok Sabha on 10 April 1969 . It was ...
The Twenty-fifth Amendment of the Constitution of India, officially known as The Constitution (Twenty-fifth Amendment) Act, 1971, curtailed the fundamental right to property, and permitted the acquisition of private property by the government for public use, on the payment of compensation which would be determined by the Parliament and not the courts. [1]
The Constitution provides no easy answers to those questions. Vague language is a feature, not a bug The lack of specific instructions is a key characteristic of the Constitution.
Dr. P.S. Deshmukh believed that the amendment of the Constitution should be made easier as he felt there were contradictory provisions in some places which would be more and more apparent when the provisions were interpreted, and that the whole administration would suffer, if the amendment to the Constitution was not made easy.