Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Trudeau said Trump was joking when he floated the idea of making Canada the 51st U.S. state, according to The Associated Press. Trudeau recently met with Trump at his Mar-a-Lago residence, the ...
In response, Smith filed his own brief on February 14, 2024, urging the Supreme Court to deny Trump's request and citing the urgency of the pending 2024 presidential election. Smith also requested that if the Supreme Court took the case, to treat Trump's request as a petition for writ of certiorari, and put the case on an expedited schedule. [39]
A landmark Supreme Court immunity decision penned by Roberts, along with another high court decision halting efforts to disqualify Trump from the ballot, were championed as major victories on the ...
In a New York case, a judge kept Trump under a gag order to prevent Trump from making comments about those involved in his court case. In July, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled presidents and former ...
The Supreme Court of Canada is the court of last resort and final appeal in Canada. Cases that are successfully appealed to the Court are generally of national importance. Once a case is decided the Court will publish written reasons for the decision that consist of one or more reasons from any number of the nine justice
While Trump appealed Mehta's ruling to the U.S. District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals in March 2022, [433] [434] the Circuit Court of Appeals panel (with Judges Gregory Katsas, Judith W. Rogers, and Sri Srinivasan presiding) upheld Mehta's ruling in December 2023 because Trump was acting "as an office-seeker not office-holder" due to ...
The Supreme Court on July 1, 2024, ruled that former presidents have substantial protection from prosecution, handing a major victory to Donald Trump, the former president who at the time was the ...
Decisions that do not note a Justice delivering the Court's reason are per coram. Multiple concurrences and dissents within a case are numbered, with joining votes numbered accordingly. Justices occasionally join multiple reasons in a single case; each vote is subdivided accordingly. Multiple unnumbered reasons are jointly written or delivered.