Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Identifies a specific part of a decision, typically by page or paragraph number. String: optional: Court name: court: The standard abbreviation for the court being cited. Example 3d Cir. String: suggested: Date: date year: The year or date in which the court rendered its decision. Date: suggested: Quote: quote: A quote from the judgment. String ...
Doe et al. v. Trump Corporation et al. is an ongoing case commenced in the U.S. District Court for Southern District of New York in October 2018, [3] [4] in which plaintiffs Lynn Chadwick, Markus Frazier, Catherine McKoy and Millard Williams [5] filed a previously anonymous lawsuit against the Trump Corporation, Donald Trump and three of his adult children — Donald Jr., Eric, and Ivanka ...
The lawsuit was a challenge to a 2011 regulation of the Federal Reserve Board setting the maximum fees that large banks can charge merchants for a debit-card transaction, [1] but the question before the Supreme Court was limited to whether the case was properly dismissed because of the statute of limitations. [2]
Inslee approved a revised recommendation to allow the Horse Heaven wind farm on Oct. 18 and the clock on filing a lawsuit started when Inslee’s decision was announced Nov. 1.
In a searing Monday judgment, a federal judge called Elon Musk’s bluff and threw out a lawsuit filed by his social media company X Corp. against an anti-hate speech nonprofit, claiming that it ...
The case challenged California's requirement that non-profit organizations disclose the identity of their donors to the state's Attorney General as a precondition of soliciting donations in the state. The case was consolidated with Thomas More Law Center v. Bonta. In July 2021, the Supreme Court ruled in a 6–3 decision that California's ...
This field can contain citations to prior decisions in the case, in trial court or lower appellate courts, or prior decisions by the subject court; these should be preceded by a two to four word description of the ruling—this (together with the subsequent history, following) is merely the bare bones procedural history of the case—what ...
Google is starting a payout for similar violations in its “Face Grouping” option — offering settlements of $200 to $400. Deadlines to file both of those claims have passed, but more may yet ...