Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Identifies a specific part of a decision, typically by page or paragraph number. String: optional: Court name: court: The standard abbreviation for the court being cited. Example 3d Cir. String: suggested: Date: date year: The year or date in which the court rendered its decision. Date: suggested: Quote: quote: A quote from the judgment. String ...
Each judge or courtroom in the United States has a law and motion calendar, setting aside the times when only motions and special legal arguments are heard. These items consist of pretrial motions (such as a motion to compel relating to discovery requests) or other legal requests that are not connected to a trial , and do not include trials ...
A calendar call is an occasion where a court requires attorneys representing different matters to appear before the court so that trials and other proceedings before the court can be scheduled so as not to conflict with one another. [1]
In a searing Monday judgment, a federal judge called Elon Musk’s bluff and threw out a lawsuit filed by his social media company X Corp. against an anti-hate speech nonprofit, claiming that it ...
A federal judge Monday dismissed a lawsuit brought by Elon Musk’s X against the Center for Countering Digital Hate, ruling it was “evident” the litigation was intended “to punish CCDH for ...
The lawsuit was a challenge to a 2011 regulation of the Federal Reserve Board setting the maximum fees that large banks can charge merchants for a debit-card transaction, [1] but the question before the Supreme Court was limited to whether the case was properly dismissed because of the statute of limitations. [2]
Good News Club v. Milford Central School, 533 U.S. 98 (2001), was a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court written by Clarence Thomas holding that a public school's exclusion of a club from its limited public forum based solely on the club's religious nature was impermissible viewpoint discrimination.
According to a filing in the Court of Federal Claims dated November 4, 2021, the case was dismissed. The decision was made after the facts of the case were considered by the Court of Federal Claims. The presiding judge was Richard A. Hertling. The court's finding provided in the document clarified that Blue Origin failed to establish foul play ...