Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The rise of high-stakes testing and the consequences of the results on the teacher is cited as a reason why a teacher might want to inflate the results of their students. [ 19 ] The first scholarly studies in the 1960s of academic dishonesty in higher education found that nationally in the U.S., somewhere between 50 and 70 percent of college ...
Indeed, there is a virtually uniform understanding among college students that plagiarism is wrong. [31] Nevertheless, each year a number of students are brought before their institutions' disciplinary boards on charges that they have misused sources in their schoolwork. [31]
Plagiarism is taking credit for someone else's writing as your own, including their language and ideas, without providing adequate credit. [1] The University of Cambridge defines plagiarism as: "submitting as one's own work, irrespective of intent to deceive, that which derives in part or in its entirety from the work of others without due acknowledgement."
The college counselor at my high school told me that she’s seen kids not apply to certain universities after hearing that fellow classmates whom they considered to be better students were applying.
However, there have been a number of occasions when persons have failed to give the necessary attribution and attempted to pass off material from Wikipedia as their own work. Such plagiarism is a violation of the Creative Commons license and, when discovered, can be a reason for embarrassment, professional sanctions, or legal issues.
For the same reason, it is unknown what scientific methodologies, if any, Turnitin uses to assess papers. [41] In 2009, a group of researchers from Texas Tech University reported that many of the instances of "non-originality" that Turnitin finds are not plagiarism but the use of jargon, course terms or phrases that
God bless the fans — they’re the only reason you’re talking to me today 10 years later — but there was a surprising degree of animus directed toward the character and even personally ...
At first, there was no reason to suspect Leibniz's good faith. In 1699, Nicolas Fatio de Duillier , a Swiss mathematician known for his work on the zodiacal light problem, publicly accused Leibniz of plagiarizing Newton, [ 19 ] although he privately had accused Leibniz of plagiarism twice in letters to Christiaan Huygens in 1692. [ 20 ]