enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Diamond v. Chakrabarty - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diamond_v._Chakrabarty

    Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303 (1980), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with whether living organisms can be patented.Writing for a five-justice majority, Chief Justice Warren E. Burger held that human-made bacteria could be patented under the patent laws of the United States because such an invention constituted a "manufacture" or "composition of matter".

  3. DABUS - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DABUS

    The judge and Thaler agreed in this case that Thaler himself is unable to receive the patent on behalf of DABUS. [ citation needed ] In their August 5, 2022, Thaler decision, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed that only a natural person could be an inventor, which means that the AI that invents any other type of invention ...

  4. List of people who have headed the United States Patent Office

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_who_have...

    Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks (PL 93-596 of January 2, 1975) [4] C. Marshall Dann: 1974: 1977 Donald W. Banner: 1978: 1979 Sidney A. Diamond: 1979: 1981 Assistant Secretary of Commerce and Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks (Public Law 97-366 of October 25, 1982) [4] Gerald J. Mossinghoff: 1981: 1985 Donald J. Quigg: 1985: 1990 ...

  5. AI cannot be named as inventor, Supreme Court rules in patent ...

    www.aol.com/ai-cannot-named-inventor-supreme...

    Robert Jehan, of law firm Williams Powell, who represented Dr Thaler at the Supreme Court, said the judgment shows “how poorly current UK patent law supports the aim of making the UK a global ...

  6. Supreme Court considers whether AI can be named as inventor ...

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-considers-whether-ai...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  7. List of United States Supreme Court patent case law

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Ruled that an injunction should not automatically issue based on a finding of patent infringement. Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc. 547 U.S. 28: 2006: Related to "tying" arrangements of patented products. LabCorp v. Metabolite, Inc. 548 U.S. 124: June 22, 2006: Dismissed as improvidently granted.

  8. AI cannot be patent 'inventor', UK Supreme Court rules in ...

    www.aol.com/news/ai-cannot-patent-inventor-uk...

    Thaler earlier this year lost a similar bid in the United States, where the Supreme Court declined to hear a challenge to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's refusal to issue patents for ...

  9. List of United States patent law cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Ariad v. Lilly - 2006. Broad infringement case related to a ubiquitous transcription factor. EBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C. - Supreme Court, 2006. Ruled that an injunction should not automatically issue based on a finding of patent infringement. Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc. - Supreme Court, 2006. Related to "tying ...