enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Sheppard v. Maxwell - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheppard_v._Maxwell

    Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333 (1966), was a United States Supreme Court case that examined a defendant's right to a fair trial as required by the Sixth Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

  3. McCleskey v. Kemp - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCleskey_v._Kemp

    McCleskey v. Kemp, 481 U.S. 279 (1987), is a United States Supreme Court case, in which the death sentence of Warren McCleskey for armed robbery and murder was upheld. The Court said the "racially disproportionate impact" in the Georgia death penalty indicated by a comprehensive scientific study was not enough to mitigate a death penalty determination without showing a "racially discriminatory ...

  4. Thompson v. Oklahoma - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thompson_v._Oklahoma

    Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815 (1988), was the first case since the moratorium on capital punishment was lifted in the United States in which the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the death sentence of a minor on grounds of "cruel and unusual punishment."

  5. McGirt v. Oklahoma - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McGirt_v._Oklahoma

    McGirt v. Oklahoma, 591 U.S. ___ (2020), was a landmark [1] [2] United States Supreme Court case which held that the domain reserved for the Muscogee Nation by Congress in the 19th century has never been disestablished and constitutes Indian country for the purposes of the Major Crimes Act, meaning that the State of Oklahoma has no right to prosecute American Indians for crimes allegedly ...

  6. Felony murder and the death penalty in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felony_murder_and_the...

    The Supreme Court of the United States has held that the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution does not prohibit imposing the death penalty for felony murder. The Supreme Court has created a two-part test to determine when the death penalty is an appropriate punishment for felony murder. Under Enmund v.

  7. Murder in United States law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_in_United_States_law

    In the United States, the law for murder varies by jurisdiction. In many US jurisdictions there is a hierarchy of acts, known collectively as homicide, of which first-degree murder and felony murder [1] are the most serious, followed by second-degree murder and, in a few states, third-degree murder, which in other states is divided into voluntary manslaughter, and involuntary manslaughter such ...

  8. Tison v. Arizona - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tison_v._Arizona

    Tison v. Arizona, 481 U.S. 137 (1987), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court qualified the rule it set forth in Enmund v. Florida (1982). Just as in Enmund, in Tison the Court applied the proportionality principle to conclude that the death penalty was an appropriate punishment for a felony murderer who was a major participant in the underlying felony and exhibited a ...

  9. Keeler v. Superior Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keeler_v._Superior_Court

    Keeler v. Superior Court, Supreme Court of California, 2 Cal. 3d 619 (1970), is a criminal case in which a man who deliberately killed a viable fetus in a woman, was determined not to be guilty of murder because the murder statute was written in 1850 when "human being" meant a person born alive, so there was no fair warning (), there being no common law crimes in California whereby statutory ...