Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
By utilising non-competitive learning structures, instructors can stimulate students to seek for success rather than trying to avoid failure. The different attainments of student's performance – success or failure – which come from one's ability or effort have various implications on student's self-esteem and feelings. [13]
A student is described as task-involved when they are interested in the task for its own qualities. This is associated with higher intrinsic motivation. Task-involved students are less threatened by failure because their own ego is not tied up in the success of the task. [2]
Intrinsic motivation is a key factor in cognitive, social, and physical development. [65] The degree of intrinsic motivation is affected by various conditions, including a sense of autonomy and positive feedback from others. [66] In the field of education, intrinsic motivation tends to result in high-quality learning. [67]
There is an interesting correlation between intrinsic motivation and educational performance according to Augustyniak, et al. [47] They studied intrinsic motivation in second year medical students and discovered that students with lower intrinsic motivation had lower test scores and overall grades. They also noted these students lacked interest ...
Multiple factors, including both intrinsic and extrinsic motivators, significantly contribute to students' academic success in higher education. Intrinsic motivators, such as personal interest and enjoyment of learning, work in conjunction with extrinsic factors like career prospects and grades to shape student achievement and engagement in ...
Educational psychology research on motivation is concerned with the volition or will that students bring to a task, their level of interest and intrinsic motivation, the personally held goals that guide their behavior, and their belief about the causes of their success or failure. As intrinsic motivation deals with activities that act as their ...
Pattengale began questioning aspects of the prevailing approach to student success, as noted in "Student Success or Student Non-Dissatisfaction". [6] Through surveying over 400 institutions he discovered that over 90% of them based their student success approach on student satisfaction surveys and external issues instead of intrinsic motivation.
According to expectancy–value theory, students' achievement and achievement related choices are most proximally determined by two factors: [1] expectancies for success, and subjective task values. Expectancies refer to how confident an individual is in his or her ability to succeed in a task whereas task values refer to how important, useful ...