Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
S v Zinn, [1] an important case in South African criminal law, was heard in the Appellate Division by Steyn CJ, Ogilvie Thompson JA and Rumpff JA on March 21, 1969, with judgment handed down on March 31. H. Snitcher QC appeared for the appellant; for the state, AJ Lategan.
The most-cited and -generally accepted of the combination theories is that laid out in S v Zinn, [15] where Rumpff JA laid out a basic triad of sentencing considerations: the crime; the offender; and; the interests of society. [16] This judgment has been taken as "confirming the combination theory as the best approach" in South African law. [14]
S. S v B; S v Bernardus; S v Chretien; S v Fernandez; S v Goliath; S v Jackson; S v Mokgethi; S v Rabie; S v Van As; S v Williams; S v Zinn; Saambou v Friedman; Singh v Santam; Sishen Hotel v Suid-Afrikaanse Yster en Staal Industriële Korporasie; Smit v Abrahams; Swadif v Dyke
R v Zinn, [1] an important case in South African law, was heard in the Appellate Division on 6 December 1945, with judgment handed down on 13 March 1946. Watermeyer CJ, Tindall JA, Greenberg JA, Schreiner JA, and Davis AJA.
Back in 2021, Clinton spoke with PEOPLE about his family's holiday traditions, sharing that he and Hillary usually visit Chelsea and her three kids — Charlotte, 8, Aidan, 6, and Jasper, 3 ...
AOL Mail welcomes Verizon customers to our safe and delightful email experience!
Fast food gets a bad rap for being unhealthy, but there are healthy fast food options at chains like McDonald’s, Pizza Hut, and Sonic. Dietitians explain.
S v M is a 2007 decision of the Constitutional Court of South Africa with import for children's rights and criminal sentencing. The court held unanimously that the best interests of the child must be considered whenever a child's primary caregiver is handed a criminal sentence.