enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Title 42 of the United States Code - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_42_of_the_United...

    Title 42 of the United States Code is the United States Code dealing with public health, social welfare, and civil rights. Parts of Title 42 which formerly related to the US space program have been transferred to Title 51 .

  3. Qualified immunity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualified_immunity

    Qualified immunity frequently arises in civil rights cases, [7] particularly in lawsuits arising under 42 USC § 1983 and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents (1971). [8] Under 42 USC § 1983, a plaintiff can sue for damages when state officials violate their constitutional rights or other federal rights. The text of 42 USC § 1983 reads as ...

  4. Monell v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monell_v._Department_of...

    Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 (1978), is an opinion given by the United States Supreme Court in which the Court overruled Monroe v. Pape by holding that a local government is a "person" subject to suit under Section 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code: Civil action for deprivation of rights. [1]

  5. Pierson v. Ray - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierson_v._Ray

    Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court first introduced the justification for qualified immunity for police officers from being sued for civil rights violations under Section 1983, by arguing that "[a] policeman's lot is not so unhappy that he must choose between being charged with dereliction of duty if he does not arrest when he had ...

  6. 42 U.S.C. §1983 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/?title=42_U.S.C._§1983&redirect=no

    Pages for logged out editors learn more. Contributions; Talk; 42 U.S.C. §1983

  7. Kachalsky v. Cacace - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kachalsky_v._Cacace

    Kachalsky v. Cacace (District - 10 Civ 05413, 2nd Circuit - 11-3642) is a case regarding the constitutionality of "may-issue" concealed carry laws. The plaintiffs, Alan Kachalsky, Christina Nikolov, and the Second Amendment Foundation, represented by Alan Gura, originally sought an injunction barring Susan Cacace, handgun licensing authority for co-Defendant Westchester County, New York, from ...

  8. Civil Rights Attorney's Fees Award Act of 1976 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Attorney's...

    The text of 42 U.S.C. § 1988(b) are as follows: "(b) Attorney’s fees In any action or proceeding to enforce a provision of sections 1981, 1981a, 1982, 1983, 1985, and 1986 of this title, title IX of Public Law 92–318, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, or section 12361 ...

  9. United States Code - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Code

    A typical example is the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA), which is codified in Chapter 21B of Title 42 at 42 U.S.C. § 2000bb through 42 U.S.C. § 2000bb-4. [31] In the case of RFRA, Congress was trying to squeeze a new act into Title 42 between Chapter 21A (ending at 42 U.S.C. § 2000aa-12 ) and Chapter 22 (beginning at 42 U.S ...