enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Comparison of audio coding formats - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_audio_coding...

    Windows Media Audio: Microsoft: 1999 11.0 Free for consumer licensees of the Windows operating system [citation needed] Free for licensees of the Windows operating system [41] Windows Media Player, Windows Media Encoder: FFmpeg (decoding only for Pro, Lossless and Voice) internet streaming Yes No Yes Yes Optional [42] Audio compression format ...

  3. Shift JIS - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shift_JIS

    Shift JIS is the third-most declared character encoding for Japanese websites (though in effect it means its superset Windows-31J is used, so it is third-most popular), declared by 1.0% of sites in the .jp domain, while UTF-8 is used by 99% of Japanese websites.

  4. MediaInfo - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaInfo

    MediaInfo is a free, cross-platform and open-source program that displays technical information about media files, as well as tag information for many audio and video files. It is used in many programs such as XMedia Recode, MediaCoder , eMule , and K-Lite Codec Pack . [ 4 ]

  5. List of codecs - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_codecs

    Linear pulse-code modulation (LPCM, generally only described as PCM) is the format for uncompressed audio in media files and it is also the standard for CD-DA; note that in computers, LPCM is usually stored in container formats such as WAV, AIFF, or AU, or as raw audio format, although not technically necessary.

  6. JIS encoding - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JIS_encoding

    JIS X 0201, the Japanese version of ISO 646 containing the base 7-bit ASCII characters (with some modifications) and 64 half-width katakana characters. JIS X 0208 , the most common kanji character set containing 6,879 characters, including 6,355 kanji and 524 other characters (one 94 by 94 plane)

  7. Comparison of video codecs - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_video_codecs

    2.525.64.184 (2008) [24] Proprietary: MPEG-1, MPEG-2 Lossy: DCT: Un­known Un­known Un­known Un­known Un­known Windows Media Encoder: Microsoft 1999 9 (2003) (WMV3 in FourCC) Proprietary: WMV, VC-1, (in early versions MPEG-4 Part 2 and not MPEG-4 compliant MPEG-4v3, MPEG-4v2) Lossy: DCT: Un­known Un­known Un­known Un­known Un­known Cinepak

  8. Windows Media Audio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Media_Audio

    These codecs were Windows Media Audio 9 Professional, [4] Windows Media Audio 9 Lossless, [4] and Windows Media Audio 9 Voice. [ 4 ] All versions of WMA released since version 9.0 – namely 9.1, 9.2, and 10 – have been backwards compatible with the original v9 decoder and are therefore not considered separate codecs.

  9. Comparison of video container formats - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_video...

    Multimedia containers interleave data in media streams to enable efficient playback using fewer computational resources, such as time spent reading from the storage drive, memory needed to buffer selected media streams, and time spent decoding when seeking to a different position in time.