enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Troxel v. Granville - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troxel_v._Granville

    Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States, citing a constitutional right of parents to direct the upbringing of their children, struck down a Washington law that allowed any third party to petition state courts for child visitation rights over parental objections.

  3. Fulton v. City of Philadelphia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fulton_v._City_of_Philadelphia

    Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, 593 U.S. 522 (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that the City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania violated First Amendment rights of a Catholic foster care agency by refusing to renew the agency's contract unless it agreed to certify married same-sex couples as foster parents.

  4. Ohio’s highest court says parent’s rights were not violated ...

    www.aol.com/ohio-highest-court-says-parent...

    The Supreme Court has set a new precedent in custody law due to a local case in which a mother said she was denied due process. Ohio’s highest court says parent’s rights were not violated in ...

  5. List of court cases involving Alliance Defending Freedom

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_court_cases...

    The ADF defended Elane Photography in its appeal of being found in violation of the New Mexico Human Rights Act for refusing to photograph a 2006 civil commitment ceremony. In August 2013 the New Mexico Supreme Court found in favor of Willock and that the photographer was in violation of the act. [20] [21] [22]

  6. Haaland v. Brackeen - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haaland_v._Brackeen

    Haaland v. Brackeen, 599 U.S. 255 (2023), was a Supreme Court of the United States case brought by the states of Texas, Louisiana, and Indiana, and individual plaintiffs, that sought to declare the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) unconstitutional.

  7. Rucho v. Common Cause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rucho_v._Common_Cause

    Rucho v. Common Cause, No. 18-422, 588 U.S. 684 (2019) is a landmark case of the United States Supreme Court concerning partisan gerrymandering. [1] The Court ruled that while partisan gerrymandering may be "incompatible with democratic principles", the federal courts cannot review such allegations, as they present nonjusticiable political questions outside the jurisdiction of these courts.

  8. Mom allegedly killed her 2 kids after judge ordered them to ...

    www.aol.com/news/2-children-allegedly-slain...

    A judge had ordered three Colorado children to spend Christmas with their father before his ex-wife allegedly violated the custody decree and killed two of the kids, court records show. Kimberlee ...

  9. Federal appeals court reverses ruling that found Mississippi ...

    www.aol.com/news/federal-appeals-court-reverses...

    The appeals court judges also wrote that a remedial order by U.S. District Judge Carlton Reeves, which sought to make changes in Mississippi's mental health system, "vastly exceeds the scope o ...