enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Ramos v. Louisiana - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramos_v._Louisiana

    Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U.S. 83 (2020), is a U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution requires that guilty verdicts be unanimous in criminal trials. See 590 U.S. 83 at 90 (2020) "Wherever we might look to determine what the term “trial by an impartial jury” meant at the time of ...

  3. Shelby County v. Holder - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shelby_County_v._Holder

    Shelby County v. Holder, 570 U.S. 529 (2013), is a landmark decision [1] of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the constitutionality of two provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965: Section 5, which requires certain states and local governments to obtain federal preclearance before implementing any changes to their voting laws or practices; and subsection (b) of Section 4 ...

  4. Jones v. Bock - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jones_v._Bock

    Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199 (2007), was a case before the United States Supreme Court. The issues concerned obligations of inmate litigants before one could file a civil rights action. The majority opinion was by Chief Justice Roberts and the court decided the case unanimously.

  5. Apodaca v. Oregon - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apodaca_v._Oregon

    Federal law requires that juries return a unanimous verdict—one that all members of the jury agree upon—in criminal trials. [2] While most states follow the same requirement for felony convictions, at the time when Apodaca reached the U.S. Supreme Court, neither Oregon nor Louisiana required state court juries to return unanimous verdicts.

  6. Supreme Court expands rights for students with disabilities - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/2017-03-22-supreme-court...

    In a unanimous decision with major implications for students with disabilities, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that schools must provide higher educational standards for children with ...

  7. Calder v. Bull - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calder_v._Bull

    The Connecticut legislature ordered a new trial in a court case about the contents of a will, overruling an earlier court ruling.In a unanimous decision, the United States Supreme Court held that the legislature's actions did not violate the ex post facto law in article 1, section 10 of the Constitution, which states:

  8. Supreme Court unanimous ruling may pave way for mass ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-unanimous-ruling-may...

    (The Center Square) – A unanimous ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court may pave the way for challenges to a federal deportation plan under the incoming Trump administration to be defeated. The ...

  9. Johnson v. Louisiana - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson_v._Louisiana

    Johnson v. Louisiana, 406 U. S. 356 (1972), was a court case in the U.S. Supreme Court involving the Due Process Clause and Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Louisiana law that allowed less-than unanimous jury verdicts (9 to 12 jurors) to convict persons ...