Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A counterargument might seek to cast doubt on facts of one or more of the first argument's premises, to show that the first argument's contention does not follow from its premises in a valid manner, or the counterargument might pay little attention to the premises and common structure of the first argument and simply attempt to demonstrate that ...
Essay Counter-essay Shortcut Description Shortcut Description WP:BLUE: Not everything needs to be referenced WP:NOTBLUE: Err on the side of over-referencing WP:MANDY: When someone is accused of unsavory allegations, no need to report their denial, as it would be obvious. WP: NOTMANDY: Include the denial WP:DFTT: Don't feed the trolls WP:YMFTT
An inference objection is an objection to an argument based not on any of its stated premises, but rather on the relationship between a premise (or set of premises) and main contention. [ 4 ] [ 5 ] For a given simple argument, if the assumption is made that its premises are correct, fault may be found in the progression from these to the ...
A counterplan is a component of debate theory commonly expounded in the activity of parliamentary and policy debate. While some schools of debate theory require the negative position in a debate to defend the status quo against an affirmative position or plan, a counterplan allows the negative to advance a separate plan or an advocacy.
Each essay is assigned a score from 0–6, 6 being high. The student's thesis may earn one point, their argument and evidence may earn up to four points, and an extra point may be earned for holistic complexity and sophistication of the argument or of the essay as a whole. The FRQ scoring was changed in 2019 from a 9 point holistic scale.
A conclusion whose merit must be established. In argumentative essays, it may be called the thesis. [23] For example, if a person tries to convince a listener that he is a British citizen, the claim would be "I am a British citizen" (1). Ground (Fact, Evidence, Data) A fact one appeals to as a foundation for the claim.
Frankfurt's examples are significant because they suggest an alternative way to defend the compatibility of moral responsibility and determinism, in particular by rejecting the first premise of the argument. According to this view, responsibility is compatible with determinism because responsibility does not require the freedom to do otherwise.
This page was last edited on 11 April 2008, at 17:42 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may ...