Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A disclaimer in a Wikipedia article is a statement or visual template that editors may attempt to insert as a warning to readers. While ideas like this have been continually proposed, the consensus is that disclaimers do not belong in encyclopedia articles and should be deleted.
Wikipedia makes no guarantee of validity. Wikipedia is an online open-content collaborative encyclopedia; that is, a voluntary association of individuals and groups working to develop a common resource of human knowledge. The structure of the project allows anyone with an Internet connection to alter its content.
Reports have sometimes [citation needed] cited the Wikipedia disclaimers to support claims that Wikipedia is unreliable. Here is a selection from the disclaimers of sources which are often regarded as reliable. Associated Press (disclaimer [original text in all caps]): "The site and the site elements are provided on an 'as is' and 'as available ...
Wikipedia may contain triggers for people with post-traumatic stress disorder. Wikipedia may contain images and videos which can trigger epileptic seizures and other medical conditions. Since Wikipedia is open to contributions from the public, there may at any time be vandalism present on Wikipedia. There may be medical, legal, or other ...
This page in a nutshell: While Wikipedia is not censored, Wikipedia articles should only contain offensive words and images for a good reason. Do not use disclaimers. Do not use disclaimers. Wikipedia guidelines
Civility – Wikipedia's basic conduct expectations. Assume good faith – unless there is clear evidence to the contrary, assume people are trying to help not harm Wikipedia. No personal attacks – comment on content, not on the contributors. Harassment – unwanted contact, intimidation, threats or posting personal information is strictly ...
However, all pages on Wikipedia are covered by one content disclaimer, thus Wikipedia does not include disclaimers on a per-page basis. There are also some similarities between them. For example, copyright violations are just as unacceptable on Fandom as they are on Wikipedia, although Wikipedia's rules on non-free content are stricter than ...
The disclaimer is accessible from mobile web by clicking the burgur menu. While this certainly makes it accessible from every article page, the user has to do an action to view the disclaimer link. Is it accurate to say "linked at every other page/linked at the bottom of every other page"? Squeezdakat 04:18, 23 September 2022 (UTC)