Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
CIC Services, LLC v. Internal Revenue Service, 593 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a suit to enjoin IRS Notice 2016–66 did not trigger the Anti-Injunction Act even though a violation of the notice may have resulted in a tax penalty.
As the litigation continued, the parties consented to a permanent injunction on 26 October 2010 shutting down the LimeWire file-sharing service. [16] The permanent injunction prohibits LimeWire from copying, reproducing, downloading, or distributing a sound recording, as well as directly or indirectly enabling or assisting any user to use the LimeWire system to copy, reproduce or distribute ...
26 U.S.C. § 7421, sometimes also called the Anti-Injunction Act, [84] prevents federal courts from exercising jurisdiction over pre-enforcement suits to restrain "the assessment or collection of any tax." [85] This statute is similar to the Tax Anti-Injunction Act but has been held to apply only to federal taxes. [86]
A civil statute of limitations applies to a non-criminal legal action, including a tort or contract case. If the statute of limitations expires before a lawsuit is filed, the defendant may raise the statute of limitations as an affirmative defense to seek dismissal of the claim. The exact time period depends on both the state and the type of ...
An injunction can require someone to do something, like clean up an oil spill or remove a spite fence. Or it can prohibit someone from doing something, like using an illegally obtained trade secret. An injunction that requires conduct is called a "mandatory injunction." An injunction that prohibits conduct is called a "prohibitory injunction."
The archaic term "suit in law" is found in only a small number of laws still in effect today. The term "lawsuit" is used with respect to a civil action brought by a plaintiff (a party who claims to have incurred loss as a result of a defendant's actions) who requests a legal remedy or equitable remedy from a court .
A federal judge finalized an injunction against the Kansas Highway Patrol detailing how troopers must comply with an order on unreasonable searches.
In the case, §507(b)'s three-year window provides for such a limitation. In addition, the Court has cautioned against invoking laches to bar legal relief. [4] The Court has never applied laches to bar, in their entirety, claims for discrete wrongs occurring within a federally-prescribed limitations period.