Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Staffing firms are also at issue in a sweeping lawsuit that California's civil rights agency filed in February against Tesla on behalf of thousands of Black workers. The Department of Fair ...
The CDFE, now the California Civil Rights Department (CRD), and Activision Blizzard announced they had settled the lawsuit on December 15, 2023, pending court approval. As part of the settlement, Activision Blizzard will set aside $54 million, with $47 million to deal with pay and promotion inequalities against female employees, and will bring ...
Criticism of Facebook#Class action lawsuit [broken anchor] Criticism of eBay#eBay Motors class action lawsuit; Deepwater Horizon litigation; Denny's#Discrimination; DirecTV#California class action lawsuit; Dow Chemical Company#Nuclear weapons; E18 error#Consumer response and class action; Ed Fagan#2002 Slavery class action lawsuit
Iglesias’ lawsuit is among the first of many that will blame utility companies and Southern California Edison in particular. The lawsuit cites multiple eyewitness accounts and images that it ...
The lawsuits were filed in Los Angeles Superior Court on behalf of homeowners, renters, business owners and others with properties destroyed by the Eaton Fire in the Pasadena area.
The case riveted the city as it was the largest case of police misconduct in Oakland in decades. Despite the settlement's hefty price tag, Russo said the cases could have cost the city tens of millions of dollars more had they gone to trial, pointing out that the victims had spent more than 25 years, combined, imprisoned on false charges.
Most of the lawsuits have been brought in state court in Los Angeles by victims of the Eaton Fire, who cited eyewitness accounts of flames near the transmission towers for the source of the blaze ...
The California Supreme Court, aware of the recent trend toward comparative rather than contributory negligence, took the opportunity to reconsider the state's tort law on the subject. The only unique feature of the case was its reasoning on Section 1714 of the Civil Code , which had been thought to codify the "all-or-nothing" approach to ...