Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In fact, one study found that if everyone ate 25% less beef, pork, and poultry, we could reduce emissions by more than 1%—about 82 million metric tons annually! What is red meat, and should you ...
People who eat more processed red meat have a greater risk of ... and dementia than those who eat very little red meat. Researchers found that replacing one daily serving of processed meat with a ...
More than half of all U.S. adults have one or more diet-related chronic health conditions and 18 million U.S. households have insecure sources of food, according to the report.
Meats such as beef have a higher climate impact since cows release methane, a greenhouse gas that is more harmful in the short-term than carbon dioxide. [123] Eating a plant-rich diet is listed as the #1 individual solution for climate change as modeled by Project Drawdown, based on avoided emissions from the production of animals and avoided ...
After adjusting for potential confounding factors, researchers found that participants who ate an average of 0.25 servings or more per day of processed red meat (“high” group) had a 14% higher ...
Preston Cabral eats meat nearly every day at home, but his favorite meals at school are served on “Meatless Mondays” and “Vegan Fridays.” “Today I ate chips, tangerines and this thing ...
[107]: p. 148 Women are also more likely than men to avoid meat for ethical reasons. [106] [108] A 2016 review found that male Germans eat more meat than females, linking the discrepancy to the finding that meat in Western culture has symbolic connections to strength and power, which are associated with male gender roles. [109]
And she said presenting eating less meat as a moral cause can be a sensitive issue. Still, she said, people should be aware of how their food choices affect the planet. But she and Hopwood acknowledged how difficult it is to change behavior. “Men are a tough nut to crack,” Hopwood said. Jose Lopez, another diner at the Dog House Grill, said ...