enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Comparison of video converters - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_video_converters

    The disadvantages of transcoding are that there is quality loss when transcoding between lossy compression formats, and that the process is highly CPU-intensive. This article compares video converters that have their own articles on Wikipedia.

  3. Comparison of video codecs - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_video_codecs

    The quality the codec can achieve is heavily based on the compression format the codec uses. A codec is not a format, and there may be multiple codecs that implement the same compression specification – for example, MPEG-1 codecs typically do not achieve quality/size ratio comparable to codecs that implement the more modern H.264 specification.

  4. Comparison of video container formats - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_video...

    No No No No No No TextST [viii] Text stream 2006-03 Patent encumbered Beta: No No No No No No No MicroDVD: Plain text: 2000-03 Proprietary: No No No No Needs alterations No No No Other Other — Varies Generic bitmap images, generic plain text [53] BIFS: Quicktime SMIL, EIA-608, CTA-708 — XSUB [x] SMPTE-TT, EBU-TT [108] [123] CTA-708 —

  5. LosslessCut - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LosslessCut

    LosslessCut is a free, platform independent video editing software, which supports numerous audio, video and container formats. [4] [5]It is a graphical user interface, with MacOS, [6] Windows [7] and Linux [8] support, using the FFmpeg multimedia framework.

  6. Lossless compression - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lossless_compression

    Most lossless compression programs do two things in sequence: the first step generates a statistical model for the input data, and the second step uses this model to map input data to bit sequences in such a way that "probable" (i.e. frequently encountered) data will produce shorter output than "improbable" data.

  7. Lossy compression - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lossy_compression

    Video can be compressed immensely (e.g., 100:1) with little visible quality loss Audio can often be compressed at 10:1 with almost imperceptible loss of quality Still images are often lossily compressed at 10:1, as with audio, but the quality loss is more noticeable, especially on closer inspection.

  8. Video file format - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_file_format

    That is the case with some video file formats, such as WebM (.webm), Windows Media Video (.wmv), Flash Video (.flv), and Ogg Video (.ogv), each of which can only contain a few well-defined subtypes of video and audio coding formats, making it relatively easy to know which codec will play the file.

  9. Data compression - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_compression

    The acceptable trade-off between loss of audio quality and transmission or storage size depends upon the application. For example, one 640 MB compact disc (CD) holds approximately one hour of uncompressed high fidelity music, less than 2 hours of music compressed losslessly, or 7 hours of music compressed in the MP3 format at a medium bit rate .