enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Did you own an iPhone 7? Owners may be owed money. Here ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/did-own-iphone-7-owners-154133836.html

    You may be eligible to claim a piece of Apple's $35 million settlement if you owned an iPhone 7 or 7 Plus between Sept. 16, 2016, and Jan. 3, 2023, and if you reported audio issues to Apple.

  3. What to know about Apple's $95 million settlement of the ...

    www.aol.com/know-apples-95-million-settlement...

    A proposed Feb. 14 court hearing has been proposed to review the settlement terms. DID APPLE BREAK ANY LAWS? ... like a lot of money, it's a pittance for Apple. Since September 2014, the company's ...

  4. Millions of Apple device owners may be eligible for a payout ...

    www.aol.com/news/millions-apple-device-owners...

    Apple agreed to pay $95 million to settle a Siri privacy lawsuit alleging the company recorded and shared portions of private conversations.

  5. What to know about Apple's $95 million settlement of the ...

    lite.aol.com/pf/story/0001/20250103/3a543c8f...

    Although $95 million sounds like a lot of money, it's a pittance for Apple. Since September 2014, the company's total profits have exceeded $700 billion — a streak of prosperity that has helped propel the company's market value to about $3.7 trillion.

  6. Have You Used This Apple Feature? You May Be Entitled To ...

    www.aol.com/finance/used-apple-feature-may...

    As per Reuters, Apple has just agreed to pay big money -- $95 million -- to settle a class action lawsuit centered around claims that Siri, its voice-activated assistant, has been "eavesdropping ...

  7. United States v. Apple (2024) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Apple_(2024)

    United States, et al. v. Apple Inc. is a lawsuit brought against multinational technology corporation Apple Inc. in 2024. The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) alleges that Apple violated antitrust statutes. [1] [2] The lawsuit contrasts the practices of Apple with those of Microsoft in United States v.

  8. Litigation involving Apple Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litigation_involving_Apple...

    The case In re Apple iPod iTunes Antitrust Litigation was filed as a class action in 2005 [9] claiming Apple violated the U.S. antitrust statutes in operating a music-downloading monopoly that it created by changing its software design to the proprietary FairPlay encoding in 2004, resulting in other vendors' music files being incompatible with and thus inoperable on the iPod. [10]

  9. Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Inc._v._Samsung...

    Apple's claims that Samsung copied the designs of the iPhone and iPad were deemed invalid. [70] The court also ruled that there was "no possibility" that consumers would confuse the smartphones of the two brands. [71] Also in 2011, Apple filed a claim in Australia that Samsung's infringing product should not be sold in that country. [72]