Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Adelanto is a former state prison about 85 miles northeast of Los Angeles that began operating as an ICE detention center in 2011. In total, California facilities can hold nearly 7,200 detainees.
Adelanto Detention Facility is a privately operated immigration detention center [1] in Adelanto, San Bernardino County, California. Owned and operated by the GEO Group , it consists of two separate facilities: East, which was an existing prison purchased in June 2010 from the City of Adelanto with a capacity of about 600 inmates, and the newly ...
A guard sits in the segregation block at the Adelanto Detention Facility in Adelanto, Calif., in 2013. ... Legal aid groups say the Trump administration will allow them back in immigration courts ...
In the 1990s, my client pleaded guilty to possession of less than a gram of cocaine. His lawyer never asked about his immigration status, nor told him the conviction would result in him losing his ...
Wilkins, 112 U.S. 94 (1884) – Court held that even though Elk was born in the United States, he was not a citizen because he owed allegiance to his tribe when he was born rather than to the U.S. and therefore was not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States when he was born.
United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543 (1976), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court that allowed the United States Border Patrol to set up permanent or fixed checkpoints on public highways leading to or away from the Mexican border and that the checkpoints are not a violation of the Fourth Amendment.
The number of cases in immigration court has quadrupled to more than 3 million since 2018, while those with lawyers have dramatically fallen. About one out of three people with pending cases ...
The respondents in this case were deported by the federal government and later reentered the country, claiming asylum. They then sought release from detention via bond hearings. The district court sided with their claims, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed, over the dissent of Judge Julius N. Richardson .