enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Four-sides model - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four-sides_model

    The four-sides model also known as communication square or four-ears model is a communication model described in 1981 by German psychologist Friedemann Schulz von Thun. [2] [3] It describes the multi-layered structure of human utterances.

  3. Profanity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Profanity

    Profanity is often depicted in images by grawlixes, which substitute symbols for words.. Profanity, also known as swearing, cursing, or cussing, involves the use of notionally offensive words for a variety of purposes, including to demonstrate disrespect or negativity, to relieve pain, to express a strong emotion, as a grammatical intensifier or emphasis, or to express informality or ...

  4. Jakobson's functions of language - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jakobson's_functions_of...

    The six factors of an effective verbal communication. Each corresponds to a communication function (not displayed in this picture). [1] Roman Jakobson defined six functions of language (or communication functions), according to which an effective act of verbal communication can be described. [2] Each of the functions has an associated factor.

  5. Hockett's design features - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hockett's_design_features

    Hockett distinguished language from communication. While almost all animals communicate in some way, a communication system is only considered language if it possesses all of the above characteristics. Some animal communication systems are impressively sophisticated in the sense that they possess a significant number of the design features as ...

  6. Expletive infixation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expletive_infixation

    For example, although unbelievable and irresponsible have identical stress patterns and the first syllable of each is a separate morpheme, the preferred insertion points are different: un-fuckin'-believable, but irre-fuckin'-sponsible. McCarthy explains this by saying they have different prosodic structures: un(be((lieva)ble)) but (irre ...

  7. Performative utterance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Performative_utterance

    In the philosophy of language and speech acts theory, performative utterances are sentences which not only describe a given reality, but also change the social reality they are describing. In a 1955 lecture series, later published as How to Do Things with Words , J. L. Austin argued against a positivist philosophical claim that the utterances ...

  8. Speech codes theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speech_codes_theory

    Philipsen addresses the criticisms of Speech Code Theory by saying that: 1. "Speech Codes Theory does not account for manifestations of power in discourse. This is a matter of omission in the theoretical assumptions, methodological framework, and examination of fieldwork materials. 2. Speech Codes Theory treats culture as overly deterministic.

  9. Category:Profanity by language - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Profanity_by_language

    Help; Learn to edit; Community portal; Recent changes; Upload file; Special pages

  1. Related searches examples of profanity language in communication theory ppt free slides pdf

    profanity symbolismwhat does profanity mean
    profanity wikipedia