enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Can a seller back out of a real estate contract? - AOL

   www.aol.com/finance/seller-back-real-estate...

   And legally speaking, it can be very difficult to do so once a real estate contract has been signed. The language of real estate contracts is typically written to protect buyers.

3. Rescission (contract law) - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rescission_(contract_law)

   First, where a party to a contract exercises an express right of termination, he or she is sometimes said to have exercised a right to rescind the contract. Secondly, where a party is faced with a repudiation, the party can elect to terminate the contract; this too has often been referred to as an election to rescind. "Rescission" at common law.

4. 72-hour clause - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/72-hour_clause

   A 72-hour clause, typically inserted in real estate sale contracts, is also known as an escape clause, release clause, kick-out clause, hedge clause or right of first refusal clause. [ 1 ] The 72-hour clause is a seller contingency which allows the seller to accept a buyer's contingent offer to purchase his/her property, while allowing the ...

5. Option fee - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Option_fee

   One distinctive feature of residential real estate contract forms promulgated by the TREC is the "termination option." The termination option paragraph of the contract gives a potential buyer, in return for paying an "option fee" to the seller, the unrestricted right to terminate the contract by giving notice of termination to the seller within ...

6. Accord and satisfaction - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accord_and_satisfaction

   Accord and satisfaction is a contract law concept about the purchase of the release from a debt obligation. It is one of the methods by which parties to a contract may terminate their agreement. The release is completed by the transfer of valuable consideration that must not be the actual performance of the obligation itself. [1]

7. Anticipatory repudiation - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anticipatory_repudiation

   The Privy Council ruled in 1966 that a party who asserts "a genuinely held but erroneous view as to the effect of the contract" should not be treated as in repudiation, but in the case of Vaswani v Italian Motors, a car seller's conduct went beyond mere assertion of such an opinion, and in demanding more money for a sale than the agreed price ...