enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Section 230 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_230

    The states of Tennessee and New Jersey later passed similar legislation. Backpage argued that the laws violated Section 230, the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, and the First and Fifth Amendments. [193] In all three cases the courts granted Backpage permanent injunctive relief and awarded them attorney's fees.

  3. Gonzalez v. Google LLC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonzalez_v._Google_LLC

    Gonzalez v. Google LLC, 598 U.S. 617 (2023), was a case at the Supreme Court of the United States which dealt with the question of whether or not recommender systems are covered by liability exemptions under section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934, which was established by section 509 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, for Internet service providers (ISPs) in dealing with terrorism ...

  4. FOSTA-SESTA - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FOSTA-SESTA

    FOSTA-SESTA; Long title: A bill to amend the Communications Act of 1934 to clarify that section 230 of such Act does not prohibit the enforcement against providers and users of interactive computer services of Federal and State criminal and civil law relating to sexual exploitation of children or sex trafficking, and for other purposes.

  5. Here's what could happen to Section 230 - the internet law ...

    www.aol.com/news/heres-could-happen-section-230...

    The Section 230 internet law is still under threat, even though the Democrats have both Houses. Big Tech will be planning how it's going to fight it

  6. What is Section 230, the rule that made the modern internet?

    www.aol.com/news/section-230-rule-made-modern...

    Any change to Section 230 is likely to have ripple effects on online speech around the globe. “The rest of the world is cracking down on the internet even faster than the U.S.,” Goldman said.

  7. Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley v. Roommates.com ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Housing_Council_of...

    Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley v. Roommates.com, LLC, 521 F.3d 1157 (9th Cir. 2008), [1] is a case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting en banc, held that immunity under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) did not apply to an interactive online operator whose questionnaire violated the Fair Housing Act.

  8. Section 230 will be on the chopping block at the next big ...

    www.aol.com/news/section-230-chopping-block-next...

    The hearing will focus on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, the key law that shields online platforms from legal liability for the content their users create.

  9. Communications Decency Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Decency_Act

    Section 230; Text of FOSTA-SESTA bill that was Presidentially signed into law as Pub.L. 115-164 (PDF (authoritative)) Internet Library of Law and Court Decisions Court decisions applying section 230 of the Communications Decency Act; Center for Democracy and Technology Overview of CDA. This refers only to the portion of the act which was struck ...