Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Full Court of the High Court hearing the case comprised Gleeson CJ, Gummow, Kirby, Hayne, Callinan, Heydon and Crennan JJ. Hearings of substantial matters began on 4 May 2006, and concluded on 11 May. The outcome of the challenge was the High Court decision of New South Wales & Ors v Commonwealth, delivered on 14 November 2006. [1]
Kable v DPP, [1] is a decision of the High Court of Australia.It is a significant case in Australian constitutional law. The case is notable for having established the 'Kable Doctrine', a precept in Australian law with relevance to numerous important legal issues; including the separation of powers, parliamentary sovereignty, Australian federalism, and the judicial role.
Cases reported in the NSWLR are selected by the Editor on the basis of their significance in relation to the interpretation, development or application of the law in New South Wales. Of the thousands of judgments delivered each year by the Supreme Court of New South Wales (including the Court of Appeal and Court of Criminal Appeal) only a ...
Ha v New South Wales: 1997 - the court invalidated a New South Wales tobacco licensing scheme, reining in the licensing scheme exception to the prohibition states levying excise duties, contained in section 90 of the Australian Constitution Kruger v Commonwealth: 1997 - stolen generations case CSR v Cigna Insurance: 1997 -
Ha & anor v State of New South Wales & Ors : Decided: 5 August 1997: Citations [1997] HCA 34, (1997) 189 CLR 465: Court membership; Judges sitting: Brennan CJ, Dawson, Toohey, Gaudron, McHugh, Gummow and Kirby JJ: Case opinions (4:3) The Court adopted a broad view of an excise in relation to section 90 (per Brennan CJ, McHugh, Gummow and Kirby ...
The Commission dismissed the appeal, and Kirk subsequently sought judicial review in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The Supreme Court held that it did not have the power to review the commission's decision due to provisions in the Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW), which limited its jurisdiction to do so (Such as s179 of the IR Act ...
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Rich [1] was one of the biggest civil cases in NSW Supreme Court history, in which the Australian Securities and Investments Commission accused former executive directors of One.Tel telecommunications company, Jodee Rich and Mark Silbermann, of having failed to meet their duty of care in the months leading up to the company's collapse in May 2001.
District Court of New South Wales Local Court of New South Wales: Judge term length: Mandatory retirement by age of 72: Number of positions: 52: Website: supremecourt.nsw.gov.au: Chief Justice of New South Wales; Currently: Justice Andrew Bell: Since: 7 March 2022 () Chief Judge at Common Law; Currently: Ian Harrison: Since: 9 November 2023 ()