Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Many people employed by companies that regularly committed accounting fraud do not blow the whistle. This is due to lack of individual accountability and moral disengagement. It has been shown that many people often get so focused on their individual tasks, they forget to think about moral responsibilities in an organization.
An example of spoonerism on a protest placard in London, England: "Buck Frexit" instead of "Fuck Brexit"A spoonerism is an occurrence of speech in which corresponding consonants, vowels, or morphemes are switched (see metathesis) between two words of a phrase.
Vicarious liability is a form of a strict, secondary liability that arises under the common law doctrine of agency, respondeat superior, the responsibility of the superior for the acts of their subordinate or, in a broader sense, the responsibility of any third party that had the "right, ability, or duty to control" the activities of a violator.
In multi-agent cases, the actions are still incompatible but the obligations concern different people. [4] For example, two contestants engaged in a competition may have both the duty to win if that is what they promised to their families. These two obligations belonging to different people are conflicting since there can be only one winner.
“People don’t care about others anymore,” he added, “even bullying my learners during lessons when they’re doing nothing wrong.” #7 I observed a car traveling 94 in a 45.
Although it may often be the case that when a person is morally responsible for an act, they are also legally responsible for it, the two states do not always coincide. [ 3 ] Preferential promoters of the concept of personal responsibility (or some popularization thereof) may include (for example) parents, [ 4 ] managers, [ 5 ] politicians, [ 6 ...
Insular: The leader and at least some followers minimize or disregard the health and welfare of those outside the group or organization for which they are directly responsible. Evil: The leader and at least some followers commit atrocities. They use pain as an instrument of power. The harm can be physical, psychological or both.
Descriptive moral relativism holds that people do, in fact, disagree fundamentally about what is moral, without passing any evaluative or normative judgments about this disagreement. Meta-ethical moral relativism holds that moral judgments contain an (implicit or explicit) indexical such that, to the extent they are truth-apt, their truth-value ...