Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Many nonfiction books for young readers are primarily intended to teach reading comprehension, phonics, or how to use text elements like infographics. The editorial process for these will primarily focus on things like reading level, Lexile measures, vocabulary lists, and the like; factual accuracy may be considered of secondary importance.
The following presents a non-exhaustive list of sources whose reliability and use on Wikipedia are frequently discussed. This list summarizes prior consensus and consolidates links to the most in-depth and recent discussions from the reliable sources noticeboard and elsewhere on Wikipedia.
Some news organizations have used Wikipedia articles as a source for their work. Editors should therefore beware of circular sourcing. [note 3] Whether a specific news story is reliable for a fact or statement should be examined on a case-by-case basis. Multiple sources should not be asserted for any wire service article. Such sources are ...
Readers are encouraged to compare articles to what they already know from reliable sources and improve the articles' accuracy and detail. Because of its growing utility, Wikipedia is cited almost daily in the press. It is possible for a given Wikipedia article to be biased, outdated, or factually incorrect. This is true of any resource. One ...
The Wikipedia articles concerning Scientology were edited by members of the group to improve its portrayal. [260] On August 25, 2010, the Toronto Star reported that the Canadian "government is now conducting two investigations into federal employees who have taken to Wikipedia to express their opinion on federal policies and bitter political ...
The guidelines for verifiability, notability and reliable sources, followed to the letter, would mean that any news event which was independently reported by multiple news reporting services on any given day could have a Wikipedia article, even if it were the most trivial coverage or sensationalistic story. Notability has no time value, so any ...
This essay has been created to help readers assess the reliability of articles. It should be noted that this essay cannot be used to prove any particular article should be considered highly reliable; the Wikipedia:General disclaimer still applies. The table below is an overview of reliability indicators.
As a result, Wikipedia articles are chiefly more neutral than many news sites or publications sponsored by certain companies. Coverage and topic importance are not significant issues in evaluating a source's reliability, but Wikipedia's coverage of certain information does appear unreasonable; it is difficult to argue that the light saber is ...