Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Although written by Steve Crocker, the RFC had emerged from an early working group discussion between Steve Crocker, Steve Carr, and Jeff Rulifson. In RFC 3, which first defined the RFC series, Crocker started attributing the RFC series to the Network Working Group. Rather than being a formal committee, it was a loose association of researchers ...
RFC 1950 : ZLIB Compressed Data Format Specification version 3.3: May 1996: Zlib v 3.3: RFC 1951 : DEFLATE Compressed Data Format Specification version 1.3: May 1996: DEFLATE v 1.3: RFC 1952 : GZIP file format specification version 4.3: May 1996: Gzip v 4.3: RFC 1964 : The Kerberos Version 5 GSS-API Mechanism: June 1996: Kerberos; GSSAPI: RFC ...
No description. Template parameters Parameter Description Type Status First RFC 1 no description Number required Second RFC 2 no description Number suggested Third RFC 3 no description Number optional Fourth RFC 4 no description Number optional Fifth RFC 5 no description Number optional Sixth RFC 6 no description Number optional Seventh RFC 7 no description Number optional Eighth RFC 8 no ...
Since 1992, a new document was written to specify the evolution of the basic protocol towards its next full version. It supported both the simple request method of the 0.9 version and the full GET request that included the client HTTP version. This was the first of the many unofficial HTTP/1.0 drafts that preceded the final work on HTTP/1.0. [3]
No description. Template parameters This template prefers inline formatting of parameters. Parameter Description Type Status RFC category 1 The topic of the RFC (Article topics or Project-wide topics) Example tech String required RFC ID rfcid 2 The ID of the RFC filled by Legobot Number suggested
Larry Melvin Masinter is an early internet pioneer and ACM Fellow. [1] After attending Stanford University, [2] he became a principal scientist [3] of Xerox Artificial Intelligence Systems and author or coauthor of 26 of the Internet Engineering Task Force's Requests for Comments.
Roosevelt saw this corporation as an advantage to the national government. The RFC could finance projects without Congress approving them and the loans would not be included in budget expenditures. Soon the RFC was able to buy bank preferred stock with the Emergency Banking Act of 1933. Buying stock would serve as collateral when banks needed ...
Your own opinions should be posted in a separate comment, not in the question itself. (The question is the part of the page shown on one of the RFC listing pages, such as Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies.) Any publicizing of the RfC should also be neutral. One option is to say only that input is requested, with a link to the RfC.