Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The 2009 elections for elected officials in Los Angeles took place on March 3, 2009, with run-off elections on May 19, 2009. The mayor , city attorney , city controller and eight out of the fifteen members of the city council were up for election.
The California state special elections, 2009 were held on May 19, 2009, throughout the state of California. The elections were authorized by the State Legislature and Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger as a part of a budget signed into law on February 19, 2009. Voters voted on six ballot propositions, 1A through 1F, for the open 26th State Senate ...
California Election Statistics One Voter Project; Elections Information California Voter Foundation "State Elections Legislation Database", Ncsl.org, Washington, D.C.: National Conference of State Legislatures, archived from the original on 2021-02-03 State legislation related to the administration of elections introduced in 2011 through this ...
The 2009 Los Angeles mayoral election took place on March 3, 2009. Incumbent mayor Antonio R. Villaraigosa was re-elected overwhelmingly and faced no serious opponent. [ 1 ] Villaraigosa would have faced a run-off against second place-finisher Walter Moore had he failed to win a majority of the vote. [ 2 ]
Los Angeles voters instead elected former federal prosecutor Nathan Hochman, a former Republican who ran as an independent and has promised to roll back Gascón's policies, which he said made it ...
The future of the streets are on the ballot in March with Measure HLA, the City Mobility Plan Street Improvement Measures initiative.. The citizen-sponsored ballot measure calls on the city to ...
At least two of the names on this year’s ballot for Los Angeles County supervisor in the 4th District will probably be familiar to voters.. Incumbent Janice Hahn, a longtime politician hailing ...
23 – Failed – 'None of the Above' Ballot Option. Initiative Statute. 24 – Removed from ballot by order of the California Supreme Court. Proposed proposition concerned legislative pay and travel expenses, as well as a financial penalty to be assessed if lawmakers did not pass the annual budget in a timely manner.