enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. BBI Judgement - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBI_Judgement

    David Ndii & Others V. Attorney General & Others also known as the BBI Judgement, was a landmark ruling made in the Kenya High Court on 13 May 2021, which issued an injunction on Kenya's Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) from proceeding with President Uhuru Kenyatta's and retired Prime Minister Raila Odinga's Building Bridges Initiative. [1]

  3. 2021 Kenyan constitutional referendum attempt - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Kenyan_constitutional...

    The Building Bridges Initiative (BBI) was a proposed set of amendments to the Constitution of Kenya initially proposed in October 2019. In the wake of the 2017 general election annulment and subsequent re-run, incumbent President Uhuru Kenyatta mandated the formation of the Presidential Taskforce on Building Bridges to Unity Advisory on 31 May 2018. [1]

  4. State legislation in protest of federal law in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_legislation_in...

    As of February 2010, legislators in Utah have introduced legislation to allow the use of eminent domain on federal land. Rep. Christopher Herrod has introduced the bill in a state where the federal government controls over 60% of the land. The effort has the full support of Republican Attorney General Mark Shurtleff, who would have to defend ...

  5. Constitutionality of the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutionality_of_the...

    Federal Election Commission (2011) that held (with Judges Brett Kavanaugh, Ricardo M. Urbina, and Rosemary M. Collyer presiding) that there is a compelling government interest in restricting the participation of foreign citizens in democratic self-government to prevent foreign influence on the U.S. political process, concluding "foreign ...

  6. Jurisdiction stripping - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jurisdiction_stripping

    Congress may define the jurisdiction of the judiciary through the simultaneous use of two powers. [1] First, Congress holds the power to create (and, implicitly, to define the jurisdiction of) federal courts inferior to the Supreme Court (i.e. Courts of Appeals, District Courts, and various other Article I and Article III tribunals).

  7. Nullification (U.S. Constitution) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nullification_(U.S...

    The Constitution does not contain any clause expressly providing that the states have the power to declare federal laws unconstitutional. Supporters of nullification have argued that the states' power of nullification is inherent in the nature of the federal system. They have argued that before the Constitution was ratified, the states essentially were separate nation

  8. Elon Musk’s X must disclose full ownership structure, judge rules

    www.aol.com/finance/elon-musk-x-must-disclose...

    Who and what exactly is invested in Elon Musk’s X Holdings, the entity behind the X platform and X.ai, is about to become a matter of public record.. In a Tuesday ruling, a federal judge in ...

  9. Federal tribunals in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_tribunals_in_the...

    Article III courts (also called Article III tribunals) are the U.S. Supreme Court and the inferior courts of the United States established by Congress, which currently are the 13 United States courts of appeals, the 91 United States district courts (including the districts of D.C. and Puerto Rico, but excluding the territorial district courts of the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, and the ...