Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Argument: Oral argument: Case history; Prior: Espinoza v. Montana Dep't of Revenue, 2018 MT 306, 393 Mont. 446, 435 P.3d 603; cert. granted, 139 S. Ct. 2777 (2019).: Holding; The application of the no-aid provision discriminated against religious schools and the families whose children attend or hope to attend them in violation of the Free Exercise Clause of the Federal Constitution.
IX, § 1 as required by the Constitution of Montana. [4] [5] The case was filed in March 2020 by Our Children's Trust on behalf of sixteen youth residents of Montana, then aged 2 through 18. [6] [7] On June 12, 2023, the case became the first climate-related constitutional lawsuit to go to trial in the United States. [4] [5]
Held v. Montana was the first constitutional law climate lawsuit to go to trial in the United States, on June 12, 2023. [104] The case was filed in March 2020 by ...
Those cases and the Montana lawsuit have resulted in a small number of rulings establishing a government duty to protect citizens from climate change. Driesen said that the effects of the ...
Case name Docket no. Date decided ... 18–587: June 18, 2020: Liu v. Securities and Exchange Commission ... Espinoza v. Montana Dept. of Revenue: 18–1195: June 30 ...
The Montana Supreme Court’s questionable decision in Held v. Montana reads more like a policy argument than a finding of law. The case was brought by a group of young people seeking to put the ...
Montana's state psychiatric hospital has been so poorly run for decades that patients are unsafe and not treated with dignity and respect, which combined with a pattern of understaffing, lack of ...
The case alleges that by affirmatively promoting a fossil fuel-driven energy system, Montana is violating the constitutional rights of the youth to a clean and healthful environment. The lawsuit also claims that the state's fossil fuel energy system is contributing to the climate crisis and is degrading Montana's constitutionally protected ...