enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. ECMAScript version history - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECMAScript_version_history

    ECMAScript is a JavaScript standard developed by Ecma International. Since 2015, major versions have been published every June. Since 2015, major versions have been published every June. ECMAScript 2024, the 15th and current version, was released in June 2024.

  3. ECMAScript - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECMAScript

    It is best known as a JavaScript standard intended to ensure the interoperability of web pages across different web browsers. [2] It is standardized by Ecma International in the document ECMA-262 . ECMAScript is commonly used for client-side scripting on the World Wide Web , and it is increasingly being used for server-side applications and ...

  4. List of ECMAScript engines - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ECMAScript_engines

    Jint: Javascript interpreter with integrated engine for .NET; Narcissus: JavaScript implemented in JavaScript (a meta-circular evaluator), intended to run in another JavaScript engine, of theoretical and educational nature only. JS-Interpreter A lightweight JavaScript interpreter implemented in JavaScript with step-by-step execution.

  5. Babel (transcompiler) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babel_(transcompiler)

    Babel is a free and open-source JavaScript transcompiler that is mainly used to convert ECMAScript 2015+ (ES6+) code into backwards-compatible JavaScript code that can be run by older JavaScript engines. It allows web developers to take advantage of the newest features of the language. [4]

  6. CommonJS - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CommonJS

    CommonJS's specification of how modules should work is widely used today for server-side JavaScript with Node.js. [1] It is also used for browser-side JavaScript, but that code must be packaged with a transpiler since browsers don't support CommonJS. [1]

  7. Talk:Comparison of JavaScript-based web frameworks - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Comparison_of...

    Can we do a clean up on these features headings / categories? They don't seem entirely relevant to frameworks designs. David P Smith 20:59, 22 September 2008 (UTC) []. We may also want to switch rows and columns, and move out the less notable frameworks (e.g. echo3, midori) into a separate "Second tier" category, as I did with List of photo sharing websites#Comparison of photo sharing websites.

  8. Comparison of web frameworks - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_frameworks

    Comparison of server-side web frameworks (back-end) Index of articles associated with the same name This set index article includes a list of related items that share the same name (or similar names).

  9. Comparison of JavaScript-based source code editors - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_JavaScript...

    Code folding: Yes Yes [5] No Some [6] No No No No No No Yes Code snippets Yes through API/add-on Some type 'for' or 'if' then Tab No Yes No Yes JavaScript Code suggestion Yes example: Yes through esprima content assist plugin: No yes [citation needed] No CSS, HTML, JavaScript) Yes Toggle syntax highlight on/off Yes Yes No last example in demo ...