enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Rookes v Barnard - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rookes_v_Barnard

    It is a factor also that is taken into account in damages for libel; one man should not be allowed to sell another man's reputation for profit. Where a Defendant with a cynical disregard for a Plaintiff's rights has calculated that the money to be made out of his wrong-doing will probably exceed the damages at risk, it is necessary for the law ...

  3. Hotchpot - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hotchpot

    "Every creditor coming in to prove under, and to take the benefit of, the English liquidation, must do so on terms of the English law of bankruptcy: he cannot be permitted to approbate and reprobate, to claim the benefit of that law, and at the same time insist on retaining as against it, any preferential right inconsistent with the equality of ...

  4. Amount in controversy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amount_in_controversy

    The 5–4 decision in Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc., 545 U.S. 546 (2005), held that a federal court has supplemental jurisdiction over claims of other plaintiffs who do not meet the jurisdictional amount for a diversity action, when at least one plaintiff in the action does satisfy the jurisdictional amount.

  5. Ex turpi causa non oritur actio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_turpi_causa_non_oritur...

    No court will lend its aid to a man who founds his cause of action upon an immoral or an illegal act. If, from the plaintiff's own standing or otherwise, the cause of action appears to arise ex turpi causa ["from an immoral cause"], or the transgression of a positive law of this country, there the court says he has no right to be assisted.

  6. Butler Machine Tool Co Ltd v Ex-Cell-O Corp (England) Ltd

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butler_Machine_Tool_Co_Ltd...

    The Court of Appeal held that the contract was on Ex-Cell-O's terms, and therefore the increase in price was ineffective. The majority followed a traditional offer and acceptance analysis. But Lord Denning MR's judgment took the approach that one should look for material agreement and the court should have the power to ignore irreconcilable ...

  7. Giuliani was indicted, found liable for defamation and nearly ...

    www.aol.com/giuliani-indicted-found-liable...

    A judge initially tossed his bankruptcy case, citing his lack of financial transparency and apparent attempts to evade court orders, leaving Giuliani’s lawyers and the people to whom he owes ...

  8. Leonard v. Pepsico, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard_v._Pepsico,_Inc.

    The plaintiff, John Leonard, discovered these could be directly purchased from Pepsi at 10¢ per point. Leonard delivered a check for $700,008.50 to PepsiCo, attempting to purchase the jet. PepsiCo initially rejected Leonard's offer, citing the humorous nature of the offer in the advertisement.

  9. Kamala Harris’ failed $1.5B campaign ‘disqualifies her ...

    www.aol.com/kamala-harris-failed-1-5b-070921522.html

    The 60-year-old vice president's failed campaign burned through the reported massive amount in just over 100 days, including millions spent on advertisements and events attended by celebrities.