enow.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: pros and cons of prologues of the bible text

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Monarchian Prologues - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monarchian_Prologues

    The prologues are, however, of no value as a historical source for the evangelists' backgrounds. They rely on the biblical text itself and various unreliable traditions as sources. [6] The earlier anti-Marcionite prologue to Luke was a source, but not the other two anti-Marcionite prologues. [7]

  3. Anti-Marcionite prologues - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Marcionite_Prologues

    The anti-Marcionite prologues are three short prefaces to the gospels of Mark, Luke and John. No prologue to Matthew is known. They were originally written in Greek, but only the prologue to Luke survives in the original language. All three were translated into Latin and are preserved in some 40 manuscripts of the Vulgate Bible. [2]

  4. Bible Historiale - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible_Historiale

    Describing his own role as translating and "ordering" the text, Guyart censored or omitted portions of the Bible that "should not, according to reason, be translated", rearranged materials "so that the laity might find them better ordered" and, on occasion, added further commentaries of his own or from other sources to produce the work known as ...

  5. Bible - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible

    The Bible [a] is a collection of religious texts and scriptures that are held to be sacred in Christianity, and partly in Judaism, Samaritanism, Islam, the BaháΚΌí Faith, and other Abrahamic religions. The Bible is an anthology (a compilation of texts of a variety of forms) originally written in Hebrew, Aramaic, and Koine Greek. The texts ...

  6. King James Only movement - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_James_Only_movement

    The exclusive use of the King James Version is recorded in a statement made by the Tennessee Association of Baptists in 1817, stating "We believe that any person, either in a public or private capacity who would adhere to, or propagate any alteration of the New Testament contrary to that already translated by order of King James the 1st, that is now in common in use, ought not to be encouraged ...

  7. Alexandrian text-type - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexandrian_text-type

    In textual criticism of the New Testament, the Alexandrian text-type is one of the main text types. It is the text type favored by the majority of modern textual critics and it is the basis for most modern (after 1900) Bible translations. Over 5,800 New Testament manuscripts have been classified into four groups by text type.

  8. Q source - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_source

    For centuries, biblical scholars followed the Augustinian hypothesis: that the Gospel of Matthew was the first to be written, Mark used Matthew in the writing of his, and Luke followed both Matthew and Mark in his (the Gospel of John is quite different from the other three, which because of their similarity are called the Synoptic Gospels).

  9. Proslogion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proslogion

    The Proslogion (Latin: Proslogium, lit. 'Discourse') is a prayer (or meditation) written by the medieval cleric Saint Anselm of Canterbury between 1077 and 1078. In each chapter, Anselm juxtaposes contrasting attributes of God to resolve apparent contradictions in Christian theology.

  1. Ad

    related to: pros and cons of prologues of the bible text