enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Post-election lawsuits related to the 2020 U.S. presidential ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election_lawsuits...

    On November 4, 2020, 4th congressional district candidate Kathy Barnette sued Montgomery County officials in federal district court. Barnette claimed the county's board of elections violated the state's election code by inspecting ballot envelopes for missing information, a process known as pre-canvassing, and by giving voters a chance to correct such deficiencies.

  3. Post-election lawsuits related to the 2020 U.S. presidential ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election_lawsuits...

    On December 4, 2020, the Minnesota Supreme Court held that the doctrine of laches applied to petitioners' claims against the secretary of state and that they had adequate time to bring suit prior to the election but failed to do so. In regards to observer access to post-election review, Minnesota law requires charges be served against county ...

  4. Republican reactions to Donald Trump's claims of 2020 ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_reactions_to...

    Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, sues the state of Pennsylvania (Texas v. Pennsylvania) alleging that election results from Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin were invalid. Within one day of Texas's filing, Trump, over 100 Republican Representatives, and 18 Republican state attorney generals filed motions to support the case.

  5. 'Biden got it absolutely wrong': Pa. officials condemn ...

    www.aol.com/biden-got-absolutely-wrong-pa...

    The Pennsylvania Supreme Court tossed out the convictions for about 2,300 ... Biden’s decision to commute the notorious judge’s sentence drew condemnation from State Sen. Lisa Baker, a ...

  6. Knick v. Township of Scott, Pennsylvania - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knick_v._Township_of_Scott...

    Knick v. Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, No. 17-647, 588 U.S. ___ (2019), was a case before the Supreme Court of the United States dealing with compensation for private property owners when the use of that property is taken from them by state or local governments, under the Due Process Clause and the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

  7. Case ID: 120401997 Control No.: 15031068

    highline.huffingtonpost.com/miracleindustry/...

    3. In an Order dated July 11, 2014, this Court granted in part Janssen’s Motion for Summary Judgment, dismissing all of Plaintiffs’ claims except for the negligent failure-to-warn claim. 4. Accordingly, the only claim presented at trial and submitted to the jury was the negligent failure-to-warn claim. 5. Trial commenced on January 23, 2015.

  8. Texas v. Pennsylvania - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_v._Pennsylvania

    Texas v. Pennsylvania, 592 U.S. ___ (2020), was a lawsuit filed at the United States Supreme Court contesting the administration of the 2020 presidential election in four states in which Joe Biden defeated then-incumbent president Donald Trump.

  9. America’s Most Admired Lawbreaker: Chapter 10 - The ...

    highline.huffingtonpost.com/miracleindustry/...

    Fifteen days before, an Arkansas judge ordered the company to pay $1.1 billion for illegal Risperdal marketing in his state. (The verdict would be thrown out two years later by the state Supreme Court, which ruled that the Arkansas false claims act did not apply to false statements about prescription drugs.)