Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
[17] [18] Case law of the Speedy Trial Act is found in 16 ALR 4th p. 1283 et seq. [8] [19] A defendant's rights under the Speedy Trial Clause of the Sixth Amendment are triggered by "either a formal indictment or information or else the actual restraints imposed by arrest and holding (imprisonment) to answer a criminal charge." [20] In the 1972 ...
Illinois v. Allen, 397 U.S. 337 (1970), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the removal of an unruly criminal defendant during his trial. In its decision, the court ruled that a trial judge may remove a stubbornly defiant defendant from the courtroom, following a warning from the judge that he will be removed if his disruptive behavior continues.
The trial continued through November 4 when the case went to the jury for deliberations. On November 5, the jury returned a verdict of guilty and a sentence of death. Strauder and his counsel moved for a new trial on grounds of an impartial juror and that the jury contained no jurors of Strauder's race, for which arguments were heard January 5 ...
WASHINGTON, D.C. - A Bucks County man, held since January 2021 for his alleged role in the U.S. Capitol riot, is finally facing trial in federal court here.
Held: Where the merits of the one and only appeal an indigent has as of right are decided without benefit of counsel, an unconstitutional line is drawn between rich and poor. [ 1 ] The Court held that a procedure like the one used by the state appellate court in which an indigent defendant was denied counsel on appeal unless he first made a ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
The holding is a court's determination of a matter of law based on the issue presented in the particular case.In other words: under this law, with these facts, this result. It is the same as a 'decision' made by the judge; however "decision" can also refer to the judge's entire opinion, containing, for example, a discussion of facts, issues, and law as well as the holding.
The case is scheduled for trial in July, but on Feb. 26, the city filed its own petition in the case, not against Mandsager, but against Brick. City: former attorney sabotaged our case