Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 573 U.S. 682 (2014), is a landmark decision [1] [2] in United States corporate law by the United States Supreme Court allowing privately held for-profit corporations to be exempt from a regulation that its owners religiously object to, if there is a less restrictive means of furthering the law's interest, according to the provisions of the Religious Freedom ...
Following the Burwell v. Hobby Lobby decision, many states have proposed expanding state RFRA laws to include for-profit corporations, [16] [17] including in Arizona where SB 1062 passed by in Arizona but vetoed by Jan Brewer in 2014.
ADF also litigated a 2014 case challenging the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare. In Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., the Court ruled that the birth control mandate in employee-funded health plans was unconstitutional, since there existed a less restrictive means of furthering the law’s interest. [5]
Download as PDF; Printable version; ... Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. C. California v. Texas; K. King v. Burwell; L. Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and ...
On June 30, 2014, the Supreme Court ruled 5 to 4 in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby that under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), closely held for-profit corporations are exempt from the contraceptive mandate, if they object on religious grounds, because the accommodation offered to objecting non-profits would be a less restrictive way to ...
One example Ranji gave of people fighting against access to emergency contraception was the 2014 U.S. Supreme Court Case Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, where the majority of the court held the craft ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
Download as PDF; Printable version; ... Burwell v. Hobby Lobby. June 29, 2014 () 0.85 ... Eight Mile Style v New Zealand National Party, ...