Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Two former Metropolitan Police officers have been handed their jobs back and will receive back-pay after winning an appeal against a ruling that they lied about smelling cannabis during a stop and ...
Officially the Police Appeals (Disciplinary) Tribunal, it is a 'virtual' non-departmental public body managed by the Home Office. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] It was established by the Police Act 1996 , and later reformed by the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 .
The appeals tribunal's chairman Damien Moore said Clapham and Franks were “dedicated, hard-working and much respected officers” whose reputations had been “ruined” by the original findings. “Both officers did not lie,” Moore said. “Both officers will now be reinstated to the Met Police. They should receive back pay.”
The Metropolitan Police is considering a legal challenge after the Police Appeal Tribunal’s decision.
Former Metropolitan Police Commander Julian Bennett, who served in the force from 1976, was found to have committed gross misconduct by failing to provide a urine sample for a drugs test on July ...
The conduct of a few may have a corrosive effect on the reputation of the police service in general.” The reason for such high standards was “…to maintain public confidence in the police service and maintain its collective reputation”. [2011] EWHC 3366 (Admin) is the first successful challenge to a Police Appeal Tribunal's decision. [15]
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate
On Tuesday, the tribunal heard evidence from detective sergeant Vicky Bailey, who compiled a report on the case, including on whether it was appropriate for officers to access the information.