Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency, 566 U.S. 120 (2012), also known as Sackett I (to distinguish it from the 2023 case), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that orders issued by the Environmental Protection Agency under the Clean Water Act are subject to the Administrative Procedure Act. [1]
Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency (alternatively called Sackett I), 570 U.S. 205 (2013), a case in which the Court ruled that orders issued by the EPA under the Clean Water Act are subject to the Administrative Procedure Act. Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency (alternatively called Sackett II), case 21-454, a case in which the ...
Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency, 598 U.S. 651 (2023), also known as Sackett II (to distinguish it from the 2012 case), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that only wetlands and permanent bodies of water with a "continuous surface connection" to "traditional interstate navigable waters" are covered by the Clean Water Act.
Sackett v. EPA , which was about a North Idaho family who moved gravel on property they owned to build a home, severely limited the EPA’s authority to regulate waterways in the U.S.
NC legislators are considering changing the state’s wetlands definition to match the federal government’s, which the Supreme Court sharply limited.
Conservation groups and water policy experts feared that the Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency ruling would create a patchwork of state protections, threatening water quality in both the ...
Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency (2012) Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency (2023) Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. City of Manhattan Beach; Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. Federal Power Commission; Sierra Club v. Morton; South Florida Water Management District v. Miccosukee Tribe; Stephanie Hallowich, H/W, v. Range ...
The illegality of relying on such temporary flooding had already been decided by the unanimous Supreme Court decision (Sackett v. EPA 2023 that simply reaffirmed Rapanos v U.S. 2006) and is ...