enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Students_for_Fair...

    America First Legal, a conservative litigation outfit headed by former Trump adviser Stephen Miller, sent letters to more than 200 U.S. law schools within days of the Court's ruling threatening them with lawsuits unless they immediately terminate all race and sex preferences in student admissions, faculty hiring, and law-review membership or ...

  3. Grutter v. Bollinger - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grutter_v._Bollinger

    Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003), was a landmark case of the Supreme Court of the United States concerning affirmative action in student admissions.The Court held that a student admissions process that favors "underrepresented minority groups" did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause so long as it took into account other factors evaluated on an individual ...

  4. Robbins v. Lower Merion School District - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robbins_v._Lower_Merion...

    [136] [137] The law requires New Jersey school districts to notify students (and their parents) who receive electronic devices from their school that their activities may be monitored or recorded. [ 136 ] [ 138 ] It subjects a school district that fails to comply with the law's requirements to a fine of $250 per student, per incident.

  5. List of landmark court decisions in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    Acton, 515 U.S. 646 (1995) Schools may implement random drug testing upon students participating in school-sponsored athletics. Ohio v. Robinette , 519 U.S. 33 (1996) The Fourth Amendment does not require police officers to inform a motorist at the end of a traffic stop that they are free to go before seeking permission to search the motorist's ...

  6. United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Students...

    United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP), 412 U.S. 669 (1973), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court in which the Court held that the members of SCRAP—five law students from the George Washington University Law School—had standing to sue under Article III of the Constitution to challenge a nationwide railroad freight rate increase ...

  7. Supreme Court to examine stalled Biden plan cancelling debt ...

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-examine-stalled-biden...

    A panel of judges appointed by Republican presidents on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit in New Orleans blocked the rule in 2023 after Career Colleges and Schools of Texas, which ...

  8. Fry v. Napoleon Community Schools - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fry_v._Napoleon_Community...

    Fry v. Napoleon Community Schools, 580 U.S. 154 (2017), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Handicapped Children's Protection Act of 1986 does not command exhaustion of state-level administrative remedies codified in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) when the gravamen of the plaintiff's lawsuit is not related to the denial of free ...

  9. O.J. Simpson's estate to fight $33.5 million payout from 1997 ...

    www.aol.com/sports/o-j-simpsons-estate-fight...

    Malcolm LaVergne, Simpson's longtime attorney and executor of the disgraced NFL star's will, told the Las Vegas Review-Journal that he will fight to prevent the payout of a $33.5 million judgement ...