enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Voting criteria - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_criteria

    If voters are arranged on a sole 1-dimensional axis, such as the left-right political spectrum for a common example, and always prefer candidates who are more similar to themselves, a majority-rule winner always exists and is the candidate whose ideology is most representative of the electorate, a result known as the median voter theorem. [7]

  3. Template:Voting criteria table - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Voting_criteria_table

    Condorcet winner [Tn 1] Condorcet loser Smith [Tn 1] Smith-IIA [Tn 1] IIA/LIIA [Tn 1] Clone­proof Mono­tone Participation Later-no-harm [Tn 1] Later-no-help [Tn 1] No favorite betrayal [Tn 1] Ballot type First-past-the-post voting: Yes No No No No No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Single mark Anti-plurality: No Yes No No No No No No No Yes Yes ...

  4. List of electoral systems - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_electoral_systems

    An electoral system (or voting system) is a set of rules that determine how elections and referendums are conducted and how their results are determined.. Some electoral systems elect a single winner (single candidate or option), while others elect multiple winners, such as members of parliament or boards of directors.

  5. Majority winner criterion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majority_winner_criterion

    Candidate B would win with a total of 80 × 9 + 20 × 10 = 720 + 200 = 920 rating points, versus 800 for candidate A. Because candidate A is rated higher than candidate B by a (substantial) majority of the voters, but B is declared winner, this voting system fails to satisfy the criterion due to using additional information about the voters ...

  6. Positional voting - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positional_voting

    The classic example of a positional voting electoral system is the Borda count. [1] Typically, for a single-winner election with N candidates, a first preference is worth N points, a second preference N – 1 points, a third preference N – 2 points and so on until the last (N th) preference that is worth just 1 point. So, for example, the ...

  7. Majority favorite criterion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majority_winner

    Candidate B would win with a total of 80 × 9 + 20 × 10 = 720 + 200 = 920 rating points, versus 800 for candidate A. Because candidate A is rated higher than candidate B by a (substantial) majority of the voters, but B is declared winner, this voting system fails to satisfy the criterion due to using additional information about the voters ...

  8. Tideman alternative method - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tideman_alternative_method

    ] Alternative-Smith voting, is a voting rule developed by Nicolaus Tideman which selects a single winner using ranked ballots. This method is Smith -efficient, making it a kind of Condorcet method , and uses the alternative vote ( RCV ) to resolve any cyclic ties .

  9. Mutual majority criterion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_majority_criterion

    Let L be a subset of candidates. A solid coalition in support of L is a group of voters who strictly prefer all members of L to all candidates outside of L. In other words, each member of the solid coalition ranks their least-favorite member of L higher than their favorite member outside L. Note that the members of the solid coalition may rank the members of L differently.