enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Murthy v. Missouri - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murthy_v._Missouri

    The lawsuit alleges that President Joe Biden and his administration were "working with social media giants such as Meta, Twitter, and YouTube to censor and suppress free speech, including truthful information, related to COVID-19, election integrity, and other topics, under the guise of combating 'misinformation'."

  3. Moody v. NetChoice, LLC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moody_v._NetChoice,_LLC

    Kagan wrote that in both cases, the appeals courts only evaluated the applicability of the laws to specific features of the social media sites, whereas a proper review would consider the laws' impact in all functions to weigh the constitutionality of the laws. [26] Injunctions against execution of both laws remained in place with this decision ...

  4. The Supreme Court Could Determine the Future of Social Media ...

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-could-determine-future...

    The Supreme Court will hear another social media censorship case in 2024, this one originally filed by Louisiana's Attorney General Jeff Landry and Missouri’s Attorney General (now Senator) Eric ...

  5. Judge limits Biden administration in working with social ...

    www.aol.com/news/injunction-blocks-biden...

    A judge on Tuesday prohibited several federal agencies and officials of the Biden administration from working with social media companies about “protected speech,” a decision called “a blow ...

  6. Takeaways from the Supreme Court’s oral arguments over social ...

    www.aol.com/news/takeaways-supreme-court-oral...

    The Supreme Court on Monday appeared deeply skeptical of arguments by two conservative states that the First Amendment bars the government from pressuring social media platforms to remove online ...

  7. Knight First Amendment Institute v. Trump - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knight_First_Amendment...

    Knight First Amendment Institute v. Trump, 928 F.3d 226 (2nd Cir. 2019), is a case at the Second Circuit Court of Appeals on the use of social media as a public forum.The plaintiffs, Philip N. Cohen, Eugene Gu, Holly Figueroa O'Reilly, Nicholas Pappas, Joseph M. Papp, Rebecca Buckwalter-Poza, and Brandon Neely, are a group of Twitter users blocked by U.S. President Donald Trump's personal ...

  8. Supreme Court to weigh GOP-backed social media 'censorship' laws

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-weigh-republican...

    The Supreme Court will decide the constitutionality of Florida and Texas laws that seek to prevent social media companies from banning users for contentious rhetoric. Supreme Court to weigh GOP ...

  9. TikTok v. Trump - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TikTok_v._Trump

    TikTok v. Trump was a lawsuit before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia filed in September 2020 by TikTok as a challenge to President Donald Trump's executive order of August 6, 2020. The order prohibited the usage of TikTok in five stages, the first being the prohibition of downloading the application.