Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A nominated member of the Rajya Sabha (Council of the States) and BJP member Subramanian Swamy said that while the lieutenant governor had to follow Delhi government's decisions, he or she could still oppose any "anti-national security or ant-constitutional decision" of the government and labelled its political leadership a group of "Naxalite ...
Building of the Supreme Court of India. The case was filed as a public interest civil writ petition by T. S. R. Subramanian, retired Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officer and former Cabinet Secretary; T. S. Krishnamurthy, retired IAS officer and former Chief Election Commissioner; N. Gopalaswami, retired IAS officer and former Chief Election Commissioner; Abid Hussain, retired IAS ...
Subramanian Swamy was born on 15 September 1939, in Mylapore, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, to a family which hailed originally from Madurai in Tamil Nadu in a Tamil Brahmin family. [ 4 ] [ 5 ] [ 6 ] His father, Sitaraman Subramanian, was a bureaucrat and his mother, Padmavathi, was a homemaker.
Page:T.S.R. Subramanian vs Union of India.pdf/47 Metadata This file contains additional information, probably added from the digital camera or scanner used to create or digitize it.
Navtej Singh Johar & Ors. v. Union of India thr. Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice (2018) is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India that decriminalised all consensual sex among adults, including homosexual sex.
UOI (2014), Puttaswamy v. UOI (2017) and Navtej Singh Johar v. UOI (2018), the petitioners argued for extending the right to marry and establish a family to sexual and gender minority individuals based on Articles 14, 15, 19, 21 and 25 of the Indian Constitution. [6] High Courts have considered the constitutionality of Indian marriage laws.
In 2014, Dr.Subramanian Swamy vs Director, CBI & Anr, Gopal successfully advocated before the Supreme Court for the invalidation of Section 6-A of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, which provided discriminatory protection from prosecution to specific categories of public servants. [12]
Subramanian Swamy was the chief petitioner. Some of the allegations involved spending on her foster son's lavish marriage in 1996 and her acquisition of properties worth more than ₹ 66.65 crore (equivalent to ₹ 364 crore or US$44 million in 2023), as well as jewellery, cash deposits, investments and a fleet of luxury cars.