Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Probabilistic logic programming is a programming paradigm that combines logic programming with probabilities. Most approaches to probabilistic logic programming are based on the distribution semantics, which splits a program into a set of probabilistic facts and a logic program.
Probabilistic logic programming is a programming paradigm that extends logic programming with probabilities. Most approaches to probabilistic logic programming are based on the distribution semantics, which splits a program into a set of probabilistic facts and a logic program.
Historically, attempts to quantify probabilistic reasoning date back to antiquity. There was a particularly strong interest starting in the 12th century, with the work of the Scholastics, with the invention of the half-proof (so that two half-proofs are sufficient to prove guilt), the elucidation of moral certainty (sufficient certainty to act upon, but short of absolute certainty), the ...
ProbLog is a probabilistic logic programming language that extends Prolog with probabilities. [1] [2] [3] It minimally extends Prolog by adding the notion of a probabilistic fact, which combines the idea of logical atoms and random variables. Similarly to Prolog, ProbLog can query an atom.
A probabilistic logic network (PLN) is a conceptual, mathematical and computational approach to uncertain inference.It was inspired by logic programming and it uses probabilities in place of crisp (true/false) truth values, and fractional uncertainty in place of crisp known/unknown values.
Horn clause logic is more restricted than first-order logic and is used in logic programming languages such as Prolog. Extensions to first-order logic include temporal logic , to handle time; epistemic logic , to reason about agent knowledge; modal logic , to handle possibility and necessity; and probabilistic logics to handle logic and ...
This probability takes three factors into account: The time remaining between the current snapshot and the election. The possibility that the polls could be wrong or that some sort of major event could shake up a race in ways that the current polls can’t measure.
In his founding book Probability Theory: The Logic of Science [1] he developed this theory and proposed what he called “the robot,” which was not a physical device, but an inference engine to automate probabilistic reasoning—a kind of Prolog for probability instead of logic. Bayesian programming [2] is a formal and concrete implementation ...