Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
the definiteness of the form of the concept reported, regardless of the goodness of fit to the inkblot. a 5-point scale with 0=very vague and 4=very specific 6: Form Appropriateness (FA) the goodness of fit of the form of the percept to the form of the inkblot. Score 0=poor 1=fair, 2=good 7: Color (C)
The Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) is a non-verbal pictorial questionnaire that directly measures a person's affect and feelings in response to exposure to an object or an event, such as a picture. [1] It is widely used by scientists to determine emotional reactions of participants during psychology experiments due to its non-verbal nature.
The figure rating scale (FRS), also known as the Stunkard scale, is a psychometric measurement originally developed in 1983 to communicate about the unknown weights of a research subject's absent relatives, [1] and since adapted to assess body image. [2] The scale presents nine male and nine female schematic silhouettes, ranging from extreme ...
Created Date: 8/30/2012 4:52:52 PM
The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a scale used to assess frailty which was evolved from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging. It is a 9-point scale used to assess a persons frailty level, where a score of 1 point would mean a person is very fit and robust, to a score of 9 points meaning the person is severely frail and terminally ill. [9]
There currently exist two variations on the SOI-R currently available in 25 languages, a 9-point response scale for integration with the original Gangestad and Simpson SOI and a 5-point response scale for the majority of subjects. The language versions include Czech, [8] English, [9] Hungarian, [10] or Polish. [11]
The hedonic scale is a sensory evaluation tool used to measure the degree of pleasure or liking of a product or service. The scale usually consists of 9 levels ranging from 1 to 9, or "dislike extremely" to "like extremely". [1] The hedonic scale is widely used for consumer acceptance testing. [2] [3]
This scale corresponds to the strength of evidence that is associated with the LLR value. It follows the 9 point scale from the ASTM technology. [1- Identified as same, 2-Highly probable, 3-Probably did, 4-Indications did, 5-No conclusion, 6-Indication did not, 7-Probably did not, 8-Highly probable did not, 9-Identified as Elimination ].